Mountaineer

joined 1 year ago
[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love the top gear reference, but surely May would have been the obvious choice, Hammond is just asking for a crash!

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

This whole episode is giving me flashbacks to the ActiveX days.

Image

The tyranny of the default.

"Here mum, I've installed Firefox for you, it's better than Chrome in every way!"
"My knitting circle website doesn't work, I can't download patterns, it says I need Chrome"

Internet Explorer was effectively abandon-ware for a decade after Microsoft used their OS pseudo-monopoly to crush Netscape.
It took another tech giant abusing THEIR monopoly to relegate IE to the trash heap it should have already been on.

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Comforting and Terrifying.
Comferrifying?
Terriforting?

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

So you won't use your banks website?
Or your utilities (gas/water/electricity/internet)?
You won't let your kids use the portal at their school for submitting assignments?
Your government sites for renewing your drivers license or scheduling hard refuse pickup?

I can think of lots of reasons that will force me to have chrome installed if this goes ahead.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/2948569

I'm a bit surprised that news.com.au let this little bit of truth slip through:

“They’re yet to come up with a plan with where the reactors can go and how much they will cost,” the spokesperson told news.com.au.

“Even if we started today, having nuclear power ready within 10 years is being generous. They’re very much against renewables, where we are backing it. Labor has implemented the $20b rewiring the nation policy, which has produced an actual change for the future.

“There are credible reports that nuclear is the most expensive source of energy in the world, so they really need to show people the plan.”

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The US (which is where I assume you are), has the second largest one in the world in current operation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_County_Pumped_Storage_Station

Short answer, it scales fine.
Now you need to find someone to pay for it.

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The Back to the Future trilogy is good for a re-view.

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but you would be seeing ALL posts from everywhere your instance knows about.

I kind of like the idea of being on lemmy.world, filtering to say aussie.zone and getting it to show me local.
Or being able to simply get a list of every community on another instance.

These are cool ideas.

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In progress as I cooked.
The post image is the final product

46
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Mountaineer@lemmy.world to c/foodporn@lemmy.world
 

In my house, this was always just "Gnocchi", so I learnt what it was called when I looked up a recipe to link here.

This is pretty similar: https://theorganisedhousewife.com.au/recipes/creamy-beef-gnocchi/

I don't add onion to this one, and I use cream instead of cheese.
I also like to chop up some whole tomatoes to add to the passata, usually cherry tomatoes.
Start by making up the sauce and leave it to simmer.
This gives it an opportunity to thicken up a bit over a low heat.

Then pan fry the gnocchi with a big chunk of butter. Unlike the linked recipe, I don't boil it first.

Finally, combine before serving.

As shown in the post photo, serve with some shredded basil and parmesan.

It's simple and it's filling, so it's a winner here.

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The first 90% of the task takes 90% of the time.
The last 10% of the task takes the other 90% of the time.

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I mean yes, but that's not a federation problem.

To completely strawman AND slippery slope what you're saying:

As a car safety pro, who primarily deals with car crashes:

STOP

TOWING

TRAILERS

Agreed, dangerous, I don't want numpties doing it.
But it's a large part of why I have a car.

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I want to be clear, that I disagree with his "federation is stupid" point, but email has problems right now.

Theoretically it's federated, theoretically you can spin up your own mail server and self host.

But even if you do that absolutely perfectly (SPF, DKIM, DMARC etc), you can falsely end up on spam list, that effectively block delivery of your email to large segments of the network for days if not weeks.

Whilst theoretically federated, email falls under the broad dominion of google, microsoft and a couple of other large players.

[–] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

JavaScript (TypeScript) has access to cookies (and thus JWT). This should be handled by web browser, not JS. In case of log-in, in HTTPS POST request and in case of response of successful log-in, in HTTPS POST response. Then, in case of requesting web page, again, it should be handled in HTTPS GET request. This is lack of using least permissions as possible, JS should not have access to cookies.

JavaScript needs access to the cookies, they are the data storage for a given site.
To protect them, the browser silos them to the individual site that created them, that's why developers haven't been able to easily load cross domain content for years, to mitigate XSS attacks.
The security relies on the premise that the only valid source of script is the originating domain.
The flaw here was allowing clients to add arbitrary script that was displayed to others.
You're dead right that only the way to fix this is to do away with JavaScript access to certain things, but it will require a complete refactor of how cookies work.
I haven't done any web dev in a few years, this might even be a solved problem by now and we are just seeing an old school implementation. 🤷

view more: next ›