Nagarjuna

joined 4 years ago
[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think you got the joke

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Moreover, the natural development of economic antagonisms, the waking consciousness of an important fraction of the proletariat, the constantly increasing number of unemployed, the blind resistance of the ruling classes, in short contemporary evolution as a whole, is conducting us inevitably towards the outbreak of a great revolution, which will overthrow everything by its violence, and the fore-running signs of which are already visible. This revolution will happen, with us or without us; and the existence of a revolutionary party, conscious of the end to be attained, will serve to give a useful direction to the violence, and to moderate its excesses by the influence of a lofty ideal.

--Ericco Malatesta, Anarchy and Violence

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

I was comparing more or less heavy handed ways of doing it. I'm advocating for as light a touch as possible. I'm trying to say that authority is a meaningful concept and that we should engage with it because it's actually very important.

It's like how some US cities put you on a payment plan for debts, while others put you in jail. They're both situations of capitalist class rule, but it's fair to call the latter authoritarian.

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I mean, there's pretty clearly a difference between the Cuban approach of letting capitalists leave vs the Russian approach of imprisoning them.

There's also a difference between the Bolivian approach of arming and training the peasantry and the GDR approach of maintaining an armed military police into peace time.

There is a meaningful difference between methods of protecting working class power, and pretending there isn't serves more heavy handed approaches.

For those of us who are abolitionists, this is a central question.

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 45 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah, but please don't say that too much, we don't want to carry water for the CCP

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Oh thank God. This is a huge break for anti colonial movements in Africa

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago

This isn't even an anticapitalist text dump on my part, just basic US history and sociology. If you're drawing anti capitalist conclusions from it, that's on you.

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

I once botched an alpine start by getting my buddy's truck stuck in the snow, took two hours to dig it out and once we were on our way, the sun was rising.

I did not climb the south sister that day.

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

Puffballs that are past their prime to eat sometimes brown on the inside too, so if there's any discoloration, don't fuck with it.

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Night hiking is fun and wonderful on well maintained trails if you have food, water, light and warmth.

Ask me about the time I fucked myself by not having those things.

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago

The opposit of love isn't hate, it's indifference

 

Anti-anarchists sometimes like to accuse "anarchists" of having terrible opinions, and then if you're like "I'm an anarchist and that's not true" they say "Oh, I mean internet anarchists."

I've seen some of you mirroring this rhetoric and complaining about "internet anarchists." This is playing into anti-anarchist rhetoric that discredits anarchism and divides the movement. You don't have to prove you're one of the good ones.

We used to call those people "baby anarchists." They weren't pretenders who we had to distance ourselves from, they were uneducated people who needed some pointers on things like cooption, anti-imperialism, lesser evilism and the non-profit industrial complex.

Don't distance yourself from internet anarchists, educate baby anarchists.

 

This is un fuking precedented. It got very little media. The movement is growing and they're trying not to amplify it.

 

“People who design machines and airplanes {or buildings}, no matter how much they believe that what they do is good, the winds of time eventually turn them into tools of industrial civilization. They’re cursed dreams. Animation, too. Beautiful yet cursed dreams.”

― Hayao Miyazaki

 

Is this political? Is it sexual pathology?

No... its about cats.

view more: ‹ prev next ›