Neptium

joined 3 years ago
[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I can’t say much about Russia’s internal divisions but muslims outside view Russia very positively.

Speaking from a Southeast Asian angle, you can easily find posts online on TikTok and YouTube praising Putin. Because to many muslims here, Orthodox Christian Russia is seen as treating muslims more favourably than the “secularists” in the West and so I don’t doubt that it was definitely intended to stoke division.

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Random SEA headlines

No excerpts this week because I was wayy too busy.

22/03/2024 Thai ports bemoan competitive decline as Srettha pushes land bridge

24/03/2024 Singapore-Malaysia's water row A good primer if anyone is interested in Singapore-Malaysia water politics.

14/03/2024 Japan, ASEAN to integrate QR code payments from 2025

Most of ASEAN have already integrated QR payments as a means of building an alternative financial system that is more resilient from Western financial warfare.

22/03/2024 ASEAN, China, Hong Kong cooperate for first time in textile industry

10/03/2024 'A perfect mess': Thailand's proposed cannabis crackdown steeped in political games and business owner anger

20/03/2024 'Today tobacco, tomorrow foreign govt?': Putrajaya urged to set up royal inquiry on who killed GEG bill

Controlling substance abuse is also a hot topic for Thailand’s neighbour, where there have been outcry about the government dropping GEG (Generational Endgame) and electronic smoking devices from the Anti-Smoking bill passed late last year. The GEG would have banned the consumption and sale of Tobacco for anyone born after 2005.

18/03/2024 Thai Parliament Set to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage By Year’s End, Official Says

22/03/2024 Three landmark agreements between S’pore and Indonesia take effect, including on airspace management

24/03/2024 China’s construction for Indonesia’s new capital Nusantara to lead growing overseas city-building portfolio

Semiconductor news on Malaysia22/03/2024 ASML supplier Neways to build new plant in Malaysia

11/03/2024 Malaysia: the surprise winner from US-China chip wars

13/03/2024 Malaysia Rises as Crucial Link in chip supply chain

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 6 months ago

2024/03/10 Manila’s attempt to shore up allies ‘futile’

excerpt

…According to estimates from open data, among the 18 defense agreements with the Philippines, only eight are regional countries while the rest are all from outside Southeast Asia, highlighting foreign interference in the South China Sea issue. 

In stark contrast to the previous Duterte administration, which pursued a peaceful settlement of disputes over the South China Sea, the current government has become more and more aggressive in stirring up tensions in the region, partly due to instigations from the US and partly out of political infighting, particularly between the two families of Duterte and Marcos, Chen Hong, executive director of the Asia Pacific Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Sunday. 

"The intention of the provocations, most recently evident in the collision incident between a Filipino vessel and a Chinese coast guard ship, is to escalate this regional issue into an international one, by coaxing and misleading countries, especially those unaware of the true situation, and getting them to join the Philippine's anti-China camp," Chen said.

However, this scheme is doomed to fail. On Saturday, a Vietnam Foreign Ministry spokesperson voiced Hanoi's deep concern over the recent tensions between China and the Philippines around Ren'ai Reef, calling on self-restraint and the serious implementation of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC).

Vietnam's reaction follows a visit to Manila by Indonesian President Joko Widodo in January with South China Sea issue high on the agenda, which experts said reflected Indonesia's urgency to "talk some sense" into the Philippines to stop its dangerous maneuvers. 

"Most ASEAN countries do not want to complicate things because they are well aware that only with stability in the South China Sea can they maintain a friendly relationship with China, which is crucial for the development of the entire region," Gu Xiaosong, dean of the ASEAN Research Institute of Hainan Tropical Ocean University, told the Global Times on Sunday. 

…Gu warned that among these foreign forces, China should pay special attention to Japan, Australia and India's collusion with Manila, as these countries are the key pawns in the US Indo-Pacific strategy. 

Leaders of Japan and the Philippines have agreed to start negotiations for a key defense pact that would allow their troops to enter each other's territory for joint military exercises. Additional Japanese patrol vessels, defense equipment and radars would be provided to strengthen the Philippines' law enforcement capability at sea, the Associated Press reported in November 2023.  

But even the US' closest allies are keeping an arm's length from South China Sea tensions. 

During a summit Australia hosted with ASEAN in Melbourne last week, while Marcos addressed the Australian Parliament with fiery rhetoric, Canberra and ASEAN seemed unmoved on the matter, calling for restraint from all parties in a collective statement. 

"In fact, even the US, the biggest agitator in the region, does not truly wish to directly confront China in the South China Sea," said Chen Hong. "Manila should be aware that it is merely 'cannon fodder' to serve Washington's hegemonic interests."

2024/03/12 Manila’s South China Sea provocations jeopardize core ASEAN principles

excerpt

In the "ASEAN Perspective on the South China Sea" series, we collect wisdom and insights from former diplomats and scholars from ASEAN countries. Peter Chang (Chang), a research associate of the Institute of China Studies at the University of Malaya, told Global Times (GT) reporter Wang Zixuan that the territorial disputes in the South China Sea are complex, yet they can and should be resolved through diplomatic means.

This is the first piece of the series.

GT: How have extra-regional countries, especially the US, influenced the situation in the South China Sea? Will Washington really help Manila if a conflict breaks out between China and the Philippines?

Chang: Certain extra-regional powers have inserted themselves into the South China Sea dispute, ostensibly in the name of upholding the freedom of navigation. These interventions have undeniably added complexity to the continuing efforts to resolve peacefully the challenges in the South China Sea.

The Biden administration has reaffirmed its commitment to defending the Philippines. The Marcos administration appears convinced that the Americans will come to their assistance in the event of a conflict. However, given the ongoing Gaza crisis and the fluctuating US support for the war in Ukraine, where American attention and resources are stretched thin, it remains uncertain whether the US has the political will to engage in yet another distant conflict on the opposite side of the globe.

GT: You once mentioned in the interview that "we've got to resolve it [the South China Sea issue] diplomatically, that is the only way." However, some scholars think that the Philippines is adopting "microphone diplomacy" on the South China Sea issue. What's your take on this? How should we work together to ensure the situation is under control through diplomacy?

Chang:…Sure, competing for and claiming territory is a source of divisions, but there are also shared goals that bind us together, such as our mutual desire for social-economic growth. It is crucial we set aside our differences and concentrate on nurturing these common aspirations, fostering economic development for the greater good of our peoples.

Without question, open hostilities between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea will have a similarly disastrous impact on countries in Southeast Asia, and beyond. 

GT: …Some have said that the Philippines' current stance on the South China Sea issue goes against the principles and interests of ASEAN. What's your view?

Chang: The Association of Southeast Asian Nations is guided by the principle of ASEAN centrality, which asserts that ASEAN should play a leading role in addressing issues pertaining to the Southeast Asian region.

The present strife between China and the Philippines, exacerbated by US instigation, poses the risk of entangling ASEAN in a proxy war between the US and China. If unchecked, this conflict threatens to undermine ASEAN centrality and relegate ASEAN to a mere pawn on someone else's geopolitical chessboard.

The ongoing confrontation also jeopardizes another core principle - ASEAN neutrality, wherein countries in Southeast Asia aim to maintain open ties with all nations, including both China and the US. The current standoff, with US support for the Philippines against China, has the potential to compel certain ASEAN member states to take sides, to the detriment of the broader well-being of the region.

GT: What lessons should the countries in the South China Sea learn from the wars in the Middle East and Europe? 

Chang: The most important lesson to learn is that we should avoid war at all costs. What's happening with the proxy war in Ukraine, as well as the conflicts in Gaza and in the Red Sea, are devastating. If there's anything we in Asia should be mindful of, it is that these conflicts ought to be resolved peacefully and diplomatically. There must be a way in which we can compromise. 

We should avoid military confrontation at all costs, because it will be a lose-lose situation for everyone if there is an open conflict. If I get the chance, I will tell my Filipino friends that it will be terrible for us to get into the situation that we see right now in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Although the phrasing and statements with regards to Gaza is a bit libby, the larger point still stands.

2024/03/10 Asean and China strive for early conclusion of code of conduct in South China Sea

excerpt

In more uplifting news…

VIENTIANE/BEIJING (Bernama): China is working with Asean nations for the early conclusion of the Code of Conduct (COC) in the South China Sea, with the second reading of the COC completed and now into third reading.

China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi who said this also gave assurance that the South China Sea would remain a "sea of peace and cooperation".

"The most important experience we have drawn is that we must adhere to two principles. First, differences should be properly managed and resolved through dialogues and consultations or negotiations between states directly involved. "Second, peace at the sea should be upheld by China and Asean countries by working together. These are also the core principles in the declaration in the conduct of parties in the South China Sea signed in 2002," Wang told a media conference Thursday.

He noted that China has been exercising a high degree of restraint on maritime disputes. "We maintain that parties should find solutions that are acceptable to each other and to all by working on the spirit of good neighbours and friendship and on the basis of respecting historical and legal facts. But abuse in such good faith will not be allowed," he said. He also urged "certain countries" outside the region not to make provocations, take sides or stir up troubles and problems in the South China Sea.

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

South China Sea Headlines

Random lib opinion piece that isn’t worthy enough to be shared because it was also awfully written

The opinion piece was by some “think tankie” with George W Bush in the name.

It basically complained that the Malaysian PM statements about how the West has some “China phobia” and how Malaysia doesn’t subscribe to such lose-lose scenarios, undermines ASEAN centrality because it is safeguarding it’s own economic interests instead of the interests of ASEAN lol

Yeah what is undermining ASEAN centrality is for an ASEAN member to state that we shouldn’t quarrel with a large economic powerhouse right beside our doorstep but not when Singapore/Philippines/Thailand hosts US military bases and/or frequently participates in US military exercises. Especially now with the Philippines’ intentional provocations against China (with encouragement from the US) and undermining actual peace and stability in the region.

Unsure how westerners can convince themselves into thinking that ASEAN centrality somehow includes security arrangements with AUKUS, India and EU to safeguard “freedom of navigation” when their involvement in the region had lead to multiple genocides, instability and warfare!

That will surely ensure ASEAN centrality and not divide the region into camps to the detriment of ASEAN centrality in the first place.

2024/03/09 Philippines strikes security deals as tensions rise with China at sea

full article quoted with additional commentary

MANILA — The Philippines has been striking new defense agreements with other countries at a rapid clip, seeking to build what officials here call a “network of alliances” that could deter Chinese aggression in disputed waters.

The Philippines has signed or entered discussions over new security agreements with at least 18 countries since a Chinese coast guard vessel flashed a military-grade laser at a Philippine coast guard ship in the South China Sea last year, according to the Philippine Defense Department.

While the deepening Philippine alliance with the United States — which includes granting the U.S. military expanded access to Philippine military bases — has drawn much attention, Manila’s security campaign goes beyond Washington. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. made nearly a dozen overseas visits in 2023, many to seek security assistance and military equipment. This year, his schedule includes delivering a rare address before the Australian Parliament as well as the keynote speech at Asia’s premier defense summit, the Shangri-La Dialogue, in Singapore.

Since 2022, the Philippines has inked new defense agreements with the European Union, India and Britain. Japan, Canada and France are looking at signing visiting-forces agreements with the Philippines, which would allow those countries to send troops to Philippine bases, according to their embassies.

If adopted, these agreements would give the Philippines one of the most robust security networks in Asia, expanding the global stakes in the rising tensions over the South China Sea, Philippine officials say. “Given that we are the underdog, we leverage our relationships with other countries,” said Jonathan Malaya, assistant director of the country’s National Security Council. “Our network of alliances is critical.”

Me when I willingly sell my country to be occupied by foreign forces.

China claims much of the South China Sea, part of the Pacific Ocean that is bounded by China, Taiwan, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam and Brunei. In recent years, China has stepped up its presence in these waters, building artificial islands with military infrastructure such as radar domes and runways.

They always ignore that there have been instances and disputes between ASEAN member states as-well in the SCS. This narrative of David vs Goliath is completely false.

Off the coast of the Philippines, Chinese ships have swarmed Philippine vessels and ignored appeals by Philippine officials to stop their aggression. Earlier this week, a Chinese coast guard ship fired water cannons at a Philippine coast guard vessel, shattering a windscreen and injuring four personnel, Philippine authorities said.

Evil China blasts our troops with high-tech pressurized water that pierces through the human skull in an instant 🤬

Last year, Marcos’s administration responded with what it called a policy of “assertive transparency,” broadcasting videos of aggressive Chinese actions at sea. But in recent interviews, top officials said the country needs more than a publicity campaign to defend its sovereignty.

Sovereignty of what exactly? The choice to be occupied by the US of A?

China has previously accused the Philippines and the United States of fueling tension in the South China Sea. Asked by reporters last year about joint air and maritime patrols between the Philippine and U.S. forces that launched in November, Wu Qian, a spokesperson for China’s Defense Ministry, said Washington had “instigated and emboldened the Philippine side to infringe upon China’s sovereignty.”

More recently, Ji Lingpeng, spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Manila, said that “bringing in outside forces and forming ‘small circles’ will not help resolve disputes in the South China Sea, but only complicate the regional situation [and] undermine regional peace and stability.”

Philippine officials disagree, saying their country is standing up for its sovereignty, not acting on behalf of Washington. And with a third of the world’s shipping passing through South China Sea, diplomats in Manila say many countries — not just the United States — have good reason to deter Chinese aggression.

Literally only the Philippines and the West “have good reason to deter Chinese aggression” it seems.

If other nations don’t defend international law, the “right of might” wins, Luc Véron, the European Union’s ambassador to the Philippines, said in an interview. “We cannot accept that our freedom of navigation in South China Sea will be impeded … by any players,” he added. In July, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made the first state visit by an E.U. leader to Manila in nearly 60 years, vowing to increase maritime security cooperation with the Philippines. “Security in Europe and security in the Indo-Pacific is indivisible,” she said.

Lol. Euros need to fuck off

Japan is negotiating a reciprocal access agreement with the Philippines that would allow the militaries of both countries to conduct joint training and exercises, similar to the Visiting Forces Agreement that the Philippines has with the United States. Diplomats from Canada and France said their countries are considering similar arrangements.

Crazy that military co-operation with the imperial power that once terrorised your populace is allowed. You are literally being doubly cucked and it’s sad to see.

Vietnam, which also borders the South China Sea, last month signed a series of new agreements with the Marcos administration, including the establishment of a hotline for maritime affairs and a memorandum of understanding on encounters with one another in the South China Sea. “Both countries very clearly recognize that the primary threat to their national sovereignty does not lie in each other, but to the north,” said Ray Powell, SeaLight director at the Stanford University Gordian Knot Center for National Security Innovation.

Uh… still coping that Vietnam will ally with the USA I see.

The Philippines is also building up its military arsenal with foreign help. India is scheduled to deliver the first of three batteries of supersonic cruise missiles to the Philippines this year, part of a $375 million contract. The Czech Republic, Germany, Italy and Sweden have offered to supply drones and submarines, while the United States, on top of supporting the Philippine military’s modernization efforts, has provided $120 million annually in grant funding to the country’s security forces, according to the U.S. Commerce Department.

The weapons must flow.

“The ultimate goal is for credible defense,” said Malaya, the security official. Marcos is the son of a former Philippine dictator once considered a pariah in international politics. But his efforts to push back against Chinese territorial intrusions have won him new popularity among leaders wary of Beijing’s growing ambitions, said Dindo Manhit, president of the Manila-based think tank Stratbase ADR Institute. “Why will all these countries visit this small [Southeast Asian] country being led by the son of a dictator?” Manhit said. “Simply because he said he will assert our rights.”

Stratbase ADR Institute Owned by some CSO liberal connected to other CSOs which are all of a bourgeois class character.

I would comb through each and every CSO but some interesting ones are “…the establishment of the U.S. – Philippines Strategic Initiative (USPI)… He is also an advisor to the Board of Asia Society Philippines”

Westerners and their comprador liberals really just justified being ruled by dynastic dictators. So much for freedom and democracy.

Marcos’s courtship of security partners marks a sharp shift from his predecessor Rodrigo Duterte, who publicly “realigned” himself with China during his six-year term. Duterte took offense when world leaders criticized his war on drugs for violating human rights and civil liberties, and at various points threatened to abrogate the Visiting Forces Agreement with the United States and to expel European diplomats. Although Duterte’s term has ended, his daughter is Marcos’s vice president. Tension between the families has risen, and in January, the two presidents publicly traded barbs, accusing one another of being addicted to drugs. If the Duterte family returns to power, the Philippines could rescind security commitments or swing back to a more pro-China foreign policy, political analysts say.

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 79 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Euros being delusional as per usual.

Malaysia’s PM Anwar Ibrahim makes ‘no apology’ for Hamas links on Germany visit

The Malaysian PM visits Germany and gets accused of supporting Hamas by an audience member - but are these westerners completely illiterate?

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has defended Malaysia's relations with Hamas, saying he made "no apologies" for his nation's historical links with the Palestinian militant group and reiterating his stance that the Middle East conflict predates the October 7 attack on Israel.

"What I reject strongly is this narrative, this obsession, as if the entire problem begins and ends with the 7th of October," the prime minister said. There had been decades of "atrocities, plunder and dispossession of Palestinians," he added at a press conference alongside German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Berlin.

Despite the hysteria that the “geopolitics understanders” made about Anwar Ibrahim’s NED credentials months ago, Westerners seemingly forget that his initial rise came from the radical student organizations in the 1970s which were in-part connected with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Iranian Revolution and other influential Islamic movements at the time.

Of course he will be anti-Israel. That has been the hallmark of Malaysian foreign policy since the beginning - even with our 1st PM in 1957 - and he was the most Western friendly of them all.

As the article mentions:

Anwar's staunch support for the Palestinians can be traced back to his years as a student leader in the 1970s including as the leader of the Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement.

Muslim-majority Malaysia does not recognise Israel's statehood. It has long been a vocal supporter of the Palestinian cause, hosting Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in 1984 and 2001 and welcoming Ismail Haniyeh and Khaled Mashal, leaders of the political wing of Hamas, in 2020.

This reminded me of when multiple “Israeli” news outlets accused Malaysia of being the most anti-semitic country on Earth, despite historically having no native Jewish population, and a residential population that at it’s peak only reached the teens. Completely unhinged and insane.

And then there’s the palm oil issue.

Banning our palm oil will not change the fact that we were able to succesfully industrialize its production and outcompete your local biofuel industry. Europeans needs to stop barking like a rabid dog. It isn’t the 1800s or even the neocolonial late 1900s anymore.

These deindustrialization policies will not work, especially when you yourself have lost any capabilities of enacting economic warfare. Hiding behind a facade of environmentalism doesn’t change reality.

As Bloomberg noted, there will be other markets that the palm oil could be sold to. You are kneecapping yourself just to appear “environmentally friendly”.

Perhaps it’s just the final cries of a region declining into subordination. The garden after all, will inevitably be reclaimed by the jungle. It just takes time.

Also I read the worst thing ever when I was researching for the post, titled “A Close Encounter With Asia’s Anti-Semitic Capital”.

Warning: Terminal crackerism.

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 41 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Pardon the long response, but you ask a good question that must be answered to actually understand Indonesian affairs.

To put it simply, understanding Southeast Asian relations with China requires understanding and knowing history.

It is incredibly short-sighted to restrict yourself to the Cold War period when generations of Southeast Asians have grown with learning about hundreds and thousands of years of their history, which is reflected in government officials speeches.

The first error is thus mistakenly viewing Indonesian history to something akin to US history, that of consisting only about 3 centuries of overwhelming violence and occupation. Although a unified Indonesia with it’s modern-day borders is obviously quite a recent and colonial invention, the actual people on the ground was born into a civilisation that predates the nation-state for millennia. There have been chinese settlers in Southeast Asia for about a millenium ( hat we know of), and Southeast Asia was part of vast trade networks that stretched across the entire Indian Ocean for as long as it existed. Indonesian foreign policy is guided by such history, both good and bad, and it’s reflected in the idiosyncrasies and contradictions you find today.

How we conducted trade, how we syncretised indigenous beliefs with Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam, how we socially organised ourselves, how we managed to sustain cultural diversity, how we interacted with China and India, are all woven into the social fabric of our societies. Colonialism was and continues to be awful - there are many glaring issues at hand, but just like how you can’t talk about India without understanding 4000 years of the caste system, you can’t talk about (maritime) Southeast Asia without also learning it’s history and peculiarities.

The second error is to say that after the 1965-66 mass killings Communism or any trace of socialism was wiped from Indonesian culture. We both know that isn’t possible. Dialectics tell us things continue to change and progress forward, it never remains static or goes backwards.

This can be seen from the simple fact that Indonesia is a republic - something that Malaysia and Brunei never achieved. This was directly because of the anti-colonial movements that violently retaliated against the collabarator feudal classes. Aspects of that revolutionary culture continue to live on, that even the “New Order” could never properly dislodge, like Non-Alignment, or self-guided industrialisation.

To quote an article I shared before,

58 years have gone—as dialectics tells us nothing is permanent, everything changes. Changes really have occurred, despite the wishes of those who governed Indonesia at the time. The fear and horror that once seemed to have penetrated even into the subconscious of the older generation (also called “the generation of victims”) and which, to a certain extent, still infect the younger generation, are beginning to fade little by little. We can say that, from the 2000s onwards, young people, even if they have sometimes been contaminated by fear, have increasingly wondered what they should we be afraid of and why. Who were the real “bad guys”? The PKI or those who killed, imprisoned, tortured the PKI and even non-PKI members, the innocent man in the street? And what about their own parents—often a very painful issue—what role exactly did they play in this carnage? Were they the victims or the executioners? These young people no longer see communism as a terrible thing, like a ghost. They want to understand what really happened, they want to understand their history, the history of their country and the history of their own family. Who was Bung Karno [Sukarno] and why did he need to be overthrown, and by whom? By the communists, or rather by the imperialists? What was his relationship with the Non-Aligned Movement and in particular with communist countries such as the Soviet Union, China, as well as other third world countries? What were his relations with the PKI? Why, despite great pressure from the military and Suharto himself, did Sukarno not want to ban the PKI? Finally, who exactly were the PKI members?

The third and final error is to project the specific forms of colonialism and capitalism found in the peripheral regions of Africa, West Asia and Latin America, onto Southeast Asia. There are aspects of capitalist dependency you can find in SEA, like in the Philippines, but Indonesia’s unique history meant that it was always able to chart it’s own waters.

The nature of the colonial-capitalism found in Indonesia, coupled by the aforementioned socialist movements that sought to reform the material conditions, lead them to pursue a much more independent path to modernization, riddled with it’s own contradictions.

This isn’t necessarily peculiar to Indonesia either, Malaysia also has quite a similar history. Vehemently anti-communist and yet one of the most pro-China member-states of ASEAN, even more-so than Indonesia.

This (seemingly) apparent contradiction has been utilised by many internal political factions for their own gain.

In the end, the masses are a practical bunch and they will never fall into the ideological dogmatism of individuals. If you have a neighbour that was in a similar spot as you, homeless, but now not only owns a house with the mortgage fully paid but also being completely renovated and offering you tips on how to be in the same spot as him - would you refuse?

The ruling class may have its ideologies, but they know their rule is supported in part by maintaining some legitimacy from the masses. And when the masses see their neighbour installing efficient 40% solar panels on their green roofs while theirs is falling apart leaking water into the attic, something must change.

Truth can only be suppressed. Never eliminated.

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 54 points 7 months ago (6 children)

If I ever want to feel better I just search “Nickel” and “Indonesia” online and see the massive amounts of cope from the West and the snarky responses the Indonesian government made towards the IMF and WTO.

Case in point: Indonesia's Nickel Supremacy: China's Backing and Australia's Decline

NOOOOOO you shouldn’t move away from primary raw commodity exports, you are our best mining colony!!!

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 55 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I want to type up a proper post that will refer to many books and articles detailing Indonesian history but I will be quite busy so I don't think I'll manage to finish it within this week's COTW.

But as for now instead I wrote a quick retrospective that can be served as the "primer" for the eventual post (whenever I'll finish it).

Many westerners has some knowledge of Southeast Asian history but it typically only focuses on Western actions in the region and it never goes deeper. "the Vietnam War", "the Phillipines recolonisation" and "the 1965-66 Indonesian Genocide" gets mentioned but it never is discussed within the 3 millenia of Southeast Asian history but especially within the last 500 years of colonization.

This is especially true for the Islamicate in Southeast Asia.

Do Westerners even know the colonial origins of the exonym of the "Malay Archipelago"? What about the Islamic and Socialist internationalist movements that sweeped across the "Malay-Islamic" civilization that consists of modern-day Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia and Indonesia? - and how Phillipines relates to this wider "civilization"?

Do westerners even know the major maddhab that most Southeast Asians muslims follow? Do they even know anything about how Islam spread across a sub-continent as wide as Lisbon to Tehran? Can they even discuss one thing about the richest company in history - the Dutch East India company? Do they even know anything about the political economy of colonial-capitalism in Southeast Asia?

This lack of knowledge stems from two faults, the rampant Orientalism and chauvinism that has penetrated the subsconcious of Western observers and even many Southeast Asians today, but also the failures of anti-imperialist and anti-colonial movements in the region. Southeast Asian history to this day is being written by the oppressors. We can't breathe nor think for ourselves.

Can you imagine that? 700 million people, with more than 1300 indigenous languages (accounting for more than 50% of all indigenous languages spoken in Asia), without any voice!

But as materialist dialectics informs us, things continue to evolve and change. Now, ASEAN is experiencing larger economic growth (relative and absolute) than Europe. Under imperial domination for 500 years (and counting) - and still growing faster. Decolonization is not over yet.

The transcription of the talk called Dialectics and Indonesian specificity at the time of imperialism's agony - Humanity (Indonesia) captures this emotional essence quite well.

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ASEAN headline dump and some excerpts. Most are non-paywalled non-archived links.

05/02/2024 Thailand eyes pact with 4 neighbouring nations to push for Schengen visa waiver

excerpt

Thailand is planning to collaborate with Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Malaysia, as well as hold talks with the European Union (EU) to launch reciprocal free-visa entries.

Prommin Lertsuridej, the PM’s secretary-general, said on Monday that Thailand will seek support from the neighbouring countries to establish an agreement allowing tourists to travel freely among the five ASEAN nations after obtaining an entry visa for any of them.

This is unlike the neocolonial arrangement of the Eurozone, because ASEAN is based while EU is cringe.

10/02/2024 ASEAN, China to intensify South China Sea Code negotiations

excerpt

In 2023, despite ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, the South China Sea hotspot continued to grab international attention with new developments on the ground. The so-called “grey zone” activities were more commonly observed. Most notably, there were some incidents between China and ASEAN member states, especially the Philippines in Spratly Islands.

Philippines President Marcos Jr. spoke about China’s continuous building of military bases in the disputed territories, saying “The situation has become direr than it was before”. Many worry these increasingly tense hostilities could escalate into a broader conflict.

...According to the statement issued by Laos Foreign Ministry after AMM Retreat, ASEAN Foreign Ministers “welcomed the progress achieved so far in the ongoing negotiations on the COC” and “looked forward to the early conclusion of an effective and substantive COC that is in accordance with international law, including the UNCLOS-1982”.

...It remains to be seen how fast the COC process could progress and how effectively the new document could restrain the actions of claimant parties. Many regional experts and scholars said that the COC negotiation is essentially a process in which all parties gradually enhance mutual trust through the accumulation of consensus, and only when this process is kept running well can a truly effective COC be reached.

To promote the negotiation to achieve more results as soon as possible, ASEAN countries and China still need to achieve more a consensus on certain issues.

09/02/2024 China warns Philippines against ‘playing with fire’ as Manila boosts military presence near Taiwan. Archive link

excerpt

China has warned the Philippines against “playing with fire” amid reports that Manila plans to bolster its military deployment on strategically important islands it controls near Taiwan.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin on Thursday reiterated Beijing’s position that Taiwan was “at the centre of China’s core interests and represents an insurmountable red line and bottom line”.

03/02/2024 US interfering hinders peaceful settlement of South China Sea issue: Philippine scholar

excerpt

The involvement of the US in the South China Sea using the Philippines is complicating the peaceful settlement of disputes. I support the Chinese government's position that parties must uphold direct negotiations and consultations and no other parties are to interfere in the process.

I oppose the current approach of the Philippine government under President Marcos, which is excessively involving the US in not only the South China Sea, but also in sensitive issues, like the Taiwan question. For example, the president has allowed the expansion of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) that is sensitive to our close neighbor China.

...There is a very strong nationalism of Filipinos on the issue of the South China Sea, but I think the public is being misled on the real issue in this region, because the Philippines is being controlled by Western media, and even our newspapers are articulating a lot of the Western perspectives..

Another headline I am too lazy to make an excerpt for, 05/02/2024 GT Voice: US-led IPEF all talk, no real action, doomed to fail

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lemmygrad’s resident Worker’s Party of Belgium member might be able to explain @DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If I recall correctly @Al_Sham@hexbear.net has linked an Arabic article on the role of civil societies for regime change in Lebanon. I can’t find it. It may prove to be helpful for you.

Onto my response, the material harm NGOs cause to people are two-fold.

On a societal level, they aim to circumvent and build alternative structures to the current government and thus without the “democratic accountability” that these governments have to face (even if they are bourgeois dictatorships, they still have to manage the contradictions within society to remain in power). This can be seen in many colour revolutions that have occurred the past 50 years.

They also introduce and import foreign concepts, what I call “academic lib phraseology”, without the democratic consultation and “diffusion” to the masses. The masses here aren’t dumb when they realise that these NGO liberals speak the same as any other NGO liberal in other countries or those in the West. This is not a coincidence.

On a local level, despite their claim to the contrary, they actually maintain and sustain the oppression of LGBT people. Since they do not address the material basis of the oppression and are funded by foreign elements, their only justification and purpose for existing IS the existence of the oppression of LGBT people in the targeted Global South country.

Why would an LGBT rights NGO founder want to achieve LGBT liberation? The founder would lose their only source of income and their entire career!

This is similar to when the labour aristocrats in a trade union stops representing the interests of the rank-and-file.

This also means that the NGOs feature the worst of the liberal activists, who are often groomed by the West in the first place through their scholarship programmes. They are filled with opportunists and careerists, because to them, civil society is their way of climbing the corporate ladder and for their “professional development”.

“LGBT” is in scare quotes because it is a foreign concept that has not gone “indigenization” or like I said before, “democratic consultation of the masses”. You may be surprised to find how many people reject the LGBT label because they recognise that this fundamental process has not occurred and perhaps may never occur if the West keeps interfering.

How does it hurt you to support gay people?

I hope my exposition here helps understand why I am hesitant in using “LGBT” uncritically.

And truthfully, gay people will not be affected if I claim to support them (or not support them) because I have only spewed words on a public forum. There needs to be action with theory - like you yourself recognise.

It doesn’t phase me in particular if you repeat these narratives and say you support gay and/or LGBT people. If you want to believe that I am a homophobe and transphobe that has a personal vendetta against LGBT people, believe away. If you only want to understand a country through Western opinion polls and what liberal Western-funded NGOs tell you, I can’t stop you.

But please don’t act surprised when anti-imperialists in the Global South reject this assertion.

view more: ‹ prev next ›