Nibodhika

joined 2 years ago
[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago

Configuration is much easier, e.g. this is the full config you need to expose nextcloud on nextcloud.example.com (assuming caddy can reach nextcloud using the hostname nextcloud)

nextcloud.example.com {
        reverse_proxy nextcloud
}

Comparing that to ngnix configs that need a template for each different service (although to be fair they're mostly the same).

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I'm currently learning Catalan, doing Duolingo until I find some class (which there should be one in a couple of months). It's relatively easy for me since I already speak fluent Spanish and Portuguese and understand almost everything in Italian.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

My point is that of those 120 probably 110 have never been compromised nor forced you to change the password due to expiration policies. The remaining 10 are the ones that require some mental gymnastics, so while the problem exists it's not as serious as it sounds. I probably have more than 120 identities using this method since I've been using it for years, and I don't think I ever had to use the counter, it's a matter of being consistent in how you think about websites, for example if you know how you refer to a site slugify it and use that for the field, so you would use spotify, netflix, amazon-prime.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Good luck, and let me know how it goes, it should be just that really, just don't touch the controller until you're through

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's weird, that's the solution, does your controller has some drift that could cause it to still be firing some thrusters?

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nope, just extra dimensional cause for creation, no higher purpose required, for all we know whenever two rocks collide in that scenario they create a universe.

Also no, you're completely missing the point, if God is omnipotent he could have made humans to never suffer and still be free, in theory most Christians believe that Heaven is free of suffering, do you cease being yourself when you go to heaven then? Just because you or I can't imagine a world where humans are free but can't hurt one another doesn't mean that's beyond the realm of possibilities, and if your counter argument will be that then we wouldn't really be free, I tell you that humans can't explode someone by looking at them, so he already imposed some limitations on the amount of harm we could cause to each other, yet you don't see this as less freedom because you just accepted that's the natural state, I propose there could be a natural state where humans can't cause harm to each other and are still free.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Obvious spoiler ahead is obvious: Just let go of the controller when you enter that area, you'll float peacefully (albeit very close to them) until the exit portal.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yup, eventually believers reach the same stopping point but instead of saying "I don't know" they go "God did it", until science explains how that happened, so believers go to the next thing and say "well I don't know how this happened, therefore God". That is called "the God of the gaps" and it's a terrible argument, it's okay to admit we don't know something.

And no, I'm not talking about Abraham, I'm talking about Jesus, the whole reason why Jesus is crucified is so that his blood can clean the sin of mankind. The basics of Christianism are the following tenets:

  1. God can't (or doesn't want to) coexist with Sin
  2. God requires blood sacrifices, usually animals, to purify Sin
  3. God offered a loophole, by sacrificing an innocent person anyone can point at that sacrifice and say "I'm using this sacrifice to purify my sins".
  4. Because there are no Sinless humans he had to come down in human form to sacrifice himself so that he could charge the innocent blood price for the Sins of mankind

Otherwise why would God need to offer himself as sacrifice to purify sins? Couldn't he just say "all sins are gone"? However you look at it he asks for a blood sacrifice, however he allows you to cash in his own blood sacrifice in its place, and if you don't he sends you to Hell, very loving fellow.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it's probably a legal thing, rreading-glasses is just metadata for books, completely legal, but readarr legality is less clear, so maybe they're trying to prevent issues.

Also I didn't understand what is rreading-glasses and why you need it

Say you want to grab a book by Isaac Asimov, you type the name of the book in readarr search bar, readarr contacts a metadata provider to show you cover images, author, date, etc. Then when you select the book readarr uses that metadata to search for downloads and ensure you're getting the correct book and not another random book with the same name.

The problem is that readarr uses a closed source API for it's metadata, and it's constantly offline, which makes it impossible to use readarr. Luckily they allow you to customize the URL for the API, and rreading-glasses is an open source implementation of that API that you can use as a drop in replacement.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Foundation is great, have you also read the Empire trilogy? Also after reading Empire + Foundation you should read The end of Eternity, it's an amazing book whose impact is only felt if you've read the other books.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yup, but most of that is easily solvable by being consistent, e.g. always use lowercase and your email (even if it's not the login for that site). But yes, you need to know to be consistent so it's a good point to make.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

No, you're not, you cheated that's the most fundamental thing not to do, that's like saying "I'm a great cook, I would argue better than the majority of cooks, I only put rat poison in my food once!", would you eat in the same restaurant where a cook intentionally put rat poison in your food once already?

view more: next ›