NotYourSocialWorker

joined 1 year ago
[–] NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah but when the prices can't go any higher they can always remove content, paying their suppliers less and getting cheaper hardware. I wish I was joking but these are the options that are left.

[–] NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Talibans, Christian fundamentalists, they are quite similar...

Restricting your own wage increase in the hope that companies won't add to inflation is very much like trying to be extra nice to an abusing partner in the hope that they won't hit you.

I know that you later wrote that you're in favor of a law restricting their ability to increase prices so please take this as an aside.

Agreed, most of home security is to try and make your neighbours a more tempting target than you. The ethical choice is to do it by making your home a bit more difficult to break into though I guess you could "debuff" the neighbours as well 😉

Or if you have kids they can't lose their keys if they just have a pin. And that pin can be changed if they tell it to someone.

I wish that he would try his hand on a lock from Yale. Considering that they are part of Assa Abloy who are very well respected in the lock business. My suspicion is that a company who are mainly makers of mechanical locks at least won't fall prey for the many of the beginners mistakes lockpicking lawyer points out.

The difference is that one will force you to actually stop, if even for just a moment. That can give you enough time to actually see oncoming traffic.

Fighting for seniority can have its downsides but without rules against it what tends to happen is companies firing skilled and experienced workers as a way to wage dump. Since so many in upper management only see wages as an expense without any meaning besides "low good, high bad" they'll gladly lose out on productivity by firing people who actually know their stuff.

I can imagine it losing him both the republican voters who dislike women and all the voters who simply dislike her.

I further believe that women voters while they do like representation they vote based on politics to a further degree.

Considering that the part about being stewards of god's creation is mentioned in the first chapter of the bible it's a feat to have missed it. But here we are

Worse actually, for all their faults I still got the impression that the Pharisees at least tried keeping all the laws.

[–] NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't help that Google tries to guess what you actually wanted to search for.

view more: next ›