PZK

joined 4 years ago
[–] PZK@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago

They can't. I guess the game is over.

What are liberals supposed to do if they can't just label something to dismiss it?

[–] PZK@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If you really think that bots are this effective, then why don't liberals create their own bots?

If you think they don't work then what is your problem with them?

[–] PZK@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I have found that liberals really, really, hate being exposed as equals to republicans.

[–] PZK@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

When it comes down to it, reactionaries are going to be repulsed by systemic change.

Have them acknowledge a problem then ask them if they would be willing to uproot a major component of the system and change it to solve the problem. Provide a detailed and serious solution. You will quickly see how they suddenly become disinterested in solving the problem. You will also likely be disappointed in realizing how many reactionaries there actually are.

[–] PZK@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago

I keep seeing the claim that their are bots everywhere when liberals encounter something they disagree with... yet they have not been able to program their own chat bots to counter them?

Surely liberals would recognize this advantageous strategy and flood the internet with their own bots. Because we know that it couldn't just be them stepping outside of astroturfed reddit, only to find their ideas are not as popular as they we led to believe.

I suppose they will just keep labeling people uselessly when encountering conflicting evidence. tankie

[–] PZK@hexbear.net 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Reaching levels of copium not thought possible.

[–] PZK@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

"This should be higher." "Savage." "Doggo." "Raises spork." "Russian bots are really active today." "CCP shills."

view more: ‹ prev next ›