If Mozilla wants to limit their use of my input, why the do I need to give them a full, non-exclusive license?
ParetoOptimalDev
joined 1 year ago
You can't export your MFA? Aegis for example allows this.
A response to apologists in your sphere:
If Mozilla wants to limit their use of my input, why the do I need to give them a full, non-exclusive license?
If Mozilla wants to limit their use of my input, why the do I need to give them a full, non-exclusive license?
If Mozilla wants to limit their use of my input, why the do I need to give them a full, non-exclusive license?
Just another nail in the coffin that hopefully convinces those who thought Proton was maybe still okay after CEO licking Trumps toes.
You shouldn't trust TurboTax so much.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/03/01/turbotax-privacy-tax-return-2024/
They also keep trying to trick you into giving consent:
https://www.moneytalksnews.com/are-turbotax-and-hr-block-sharing-your-personal-info/
They also lobby to keep taxes complex.
Yeah, no. The people who thought Trump was a fluke the first time around are the problem and need to adjust accordingly.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out its true.
The problem is it shouldn't be a blight because its impossible to prevent bad actors from using an actually private and secure messaging app.
So the act of reporting on it is a smear because most don't understand or acknowledge the impossibility of preventing those bad actors.
Signal if you trust them to not leak your identifier and because its gotten the most mass adoption.
Simplex if you can convince your circle to use it because it has no identifiers and is user friendly.
If you cant get people to do it for a day, you surely cant get them to do the planning necessary for a month.