PizzaMan

joined 1 year ago
[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You should have seen my comment chain with /u/10A.

https://kbin.social/m/conservative@lemmy.world/t/305925/-/comment/1679835

I'm certainly not arguing in bad faith, or here to start fights.

I haven't been banned because I haven't been doing anything wrong.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah, because no republican would ever use government power to invade people's privacy.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s the leader of the democrats right now.

And he doesn't represent all democrats

I’ll give you the same challenge

I've already explained why this comparison is silly.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

An unproven model that is risky. If they really wanted to show it works, raise taxes and fund both.

It isn't unproven, and the second wouldn't make conservatives happy anyways so I'm not sure why you're suggesting it.

And again, the majority of democrats never supported this.

No democrats are not better with economics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._economic_performance_under_Democratic_and_Republican_presidents

https://www.factsarefirst.com/metrics/gdp-growth/

https://www.self.inc/info/us-debt-by-president/

They are.

Women should have the right to compete against other females in sports and shouldn’t be subjected to undressing in front of trans women.

Trans rights doesn't exclude this first bit, and dressing rooms should be private. This isn't hard.

She’s entitled to her opinion as a feminist.

She is a self described TERF, aka a bigot.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They changed tune after they say people didn’t want that and crime was increasing. Yet still some are pushing it such as

Doesn't matter because most democrats never supported it as you understand it.

It shows a trillion dollar deficit increase. Thats spending without a plan.

Which is tame in comparison to how much it grows under republicans. Under democrats the deficit usually goes down, under republicans it usually explodes. That's because democrats are generally better at economics. Republicans just give tax breaks to the rich and borrow the remainder.

When trans rights infringe on the rights of women.

They don't though.

Jk Rowling has written some wonderful articles on the topic

I'm going to continue to avoid her bigoted ass like the plague.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not going to waste my time with a propaganda site.

And this whole excerise is just silly, because Biden doesn't represent all democrats. Most of us hate him. So it makes no sense to extrapolate how racist democrats are off of him, especially when you're not even considering the very long list of racist shit Trump has done.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

https://rollcall.com/2022/04/27/defund-the-police-still-haunts-democrats/

A minority of democrats support this as its commonly understood, and so it's not true that democrats support this.

https://budget.house.gov/press-release/cbo-reports-14-trillion-deficit-in-first-nine-months-of-fy2023-under-bidens-watch

This isn't a source from the democrats and therefore doesn't support your conclusion that democrats have no spending plan.

I don’t support taking away from women to benefit trans women.

You don't need to take away from women for trans people to have rights.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

They want to dismantle the police, spend more without figuring out how to pay for anything. They push misogynistic policies.

None of that is true.

The democrats are just a mess.

They absolutely are, but not for the ressons you're listing. That's why I hate voting for them but unfortunately do because there are no better choices thanks to our dumb two party system.

Companies should not be running the show.

I agree. And thats why I think giving politicians money in any form should be criminalized, we should switch to STAR voting, elections should be run from shared fund pools, etc.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's not just a conservative group, it's just pure propaganda.

You gotta go to higher quality sources than that.

https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Yes a reasonable person wouldn’t need to disavow since nobody would associate the two.

Yeah that makes no sense. If a Nazi supports me I'm going to tell them to fuck right off regardless. That's the right thing to do.

https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/commentary/bidens-history-getting-away-racist-remarks

And this is just a propaganda group.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

You made a trolling comment.

If by trolling you mean "critical", then sure, but otherwise no.

The democrats are a party based on racism and classes. Everyone is a victim and they need the government to fix their problems.

Not really. The democrats are a corporate owned, vaguely centrist to right wing party. As for your nanny state worries, those just honestly don't make sense.

I voted for the democrats twice and nothing came from it

Our political system is intentionally designed to only change slowly. So expecting massive change from 2 single votes is quite frankly ridiculous. And again, democrats are corporate owned, so even when they get in they largely don't do anything useful.

[–] PizzaMan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

No because no reasonable person would associate Nazis and Trump.

That's not what the conversation is about though. You said:

"A normal person wouldn’t disavow something."

Are you unable to keep track?

What sort of idiot would think Trump who has a Jewish daughter is a Nazi?

I never made that claim.

Biden on the other hand has shown support for the KKK and other white supremacist ideology.

That's some horseshit. Your ability to fact check is lacking.

view more: ‹ prev next ›