I personally use the cordless clipper trimmer combo from wahl. I use the clipper for fading into the legs / stomach and the trimmer for the sensitive bits. Though if you are prone to ingrown hairs then you may want to skip the trimmer and use something like a headblade / aveline for cleaning up the package. I've included some helpful links.
PoorYorick
I highly recommend adjustable clippers.
Just have to fade it in.
No need to apologize to me dude. If you are that age and still feel like sex is the peak of your life's achievement, then I am happy for you.
In fairness, I really like onion rings.
Depends on your age bracket, in my opinion.
At 20, it's like catching the game winning touchdown for the national championship when your team was the underdog.
At 40, it's like winning a hundred bucks on a lottery scratcher.
At 50, it's like getting a free order of onion rings with your meal.
At 60, it's like getting an extra nugget in your 9 piece.
Not usually a big fan of trick taking games, but I got the opportunity to play Cat in the Box the other day and thoroughly enjoyed it. To the point that I actually intend to add it to my collection at some point.
Who said anything about solutions. Like I said, I am just asking questions here.
There is zero evidence for the Obama birther story, "The Big Lie" for the 2020 election, the Springfield Haitians, Kamala's audio device earnings, or any other story the GOP tries to push. Since when is evidence really needed for them?
I mean I'm just asking questions here. If the implications make the GOP uncomfortable maybe they should address them.
I would agree that having someone else killed would be too far for it to be staged for most people. That said, I have seen no evidence that makes me think the GOP considers anyone who isn't a billionaire or one of their mouthpieces a person.
To them, a random person in the crowd getting killed would just be a data point in their news story. Then just pack on a blood pack, and a fake bandage to sell it like wrestlemania 23.
I am firmly convinced, based solely on what the tinfoil hat whispers to me, that both of these "attempts" were funded by the GOP as an effort to drive media attention towards Trump.
After all, they have fully admitted to making up stories to get media attention. Is it really too far of a stretch to think that they would pay some poor sucker they view as disposable into being a threat in his general vicinity. The whole thing just feels like a media stunt from a wrestling promo.
It's hard to overstate how important the film is to cinema. It pretty much established what the modern movie is.
That said, based strictly off of entertainment value. IMO it is just absolutely terrible.