Man, proper multi monitor support, smoother animations, a stable desktop experience, lower resource usage and an actually comprehensible desktop stack. Yeah, Wayland is such a mistake, we must go back to the unix way, back to X10 even. And you mentioned that people who like Wayland should go to MacOS... Yk a system, using X11.
Ik you're just rage baiting for attention but what the hell, I'm bored.
Gatekeeping and acting like you're smarter than everyone else... General neckbeard behavior. Linux/Computers in general can be a great hobby if you can get past the "RTFM, yoUr stUPiD fOR asKing" people.
I mean, when you frame it like that, maybe systemd being so big isn't that bad
Nah it's more like xorg bad because:
-
It cannot handle multi monitors well
-
it's slow as shit
-
you cannot have desktop animations and do anything graphically intensive
-
it's buggy
-
Xorg screen sharing sucks... It just does. I know I'm gonna get shit on for this, but pipewire screensharing is way better when it works.
-
No variable refresh rate support
-
No plans for HDR support
-
No 1:1 touchpad gestures (elementary os not included)
Wayland is just better, unless you have a very niche hardware setup or are trying to use an older Nvidia GPU with the proprietary driver...
Discover shows updates to both your flatpaks apps and dnf apps
A headphone jack, bluetooth sucks, it's convenient but it sucks. It's audio quality is bad, it's latency is bad... it's just all bad.
I'd say, since you already own the DVD, it's ok to download it's contents from a piracy website...
If you don't like webapps, make native UI frameworks easier to use and cross-platform...
Everyone called me mad when I told them that I get more FPS in linux through wine/proton than on windows native with my AMD card, look who's laughing now
"how do you code so well?"
"I don't"
you can't spy on me through my webcam, I don't have one