Pringles

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What kind of moronic idea is this? How does giving away the most coveted technology help Europe in any way?

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Yes, this is the sane take on this. Some weapon systems and ammunition are simply not available from European weapons manufacturers. Buying from the US is sometimes the only option until a European variant has been developed. It's not as if the European MIC is going to catch up with all modern warfare technology in a matter of months. It takes years to develop a working system (like an MLRS for intercepting ballistic missiles) and some more years to set up a robust supply chain and start producing.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

In order to forget, one must first have remembered something, so probably no.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can see how some tariffs might help us compete with Mexico but are we really getting targeted by every other country or are we on the wrong side of this?

Waw, just... I can't even...

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

Are they going to rename the freedom fries to vassal fries now?

The cognitive dissonance of this guy is unbelievable.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sync is Spanish? Huh, I always assumed British or american based on the devs handle

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, for the EU, China will have to open up its economy for open and fair competition, get rid of its IP sharing requirements and stop manipulating the Renminbi to keep it artificially low. Even then it should be quota based to stop them from dumping practices to take out local competitors.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

Not expulsion, there is no mechanism for that. Voting right suspension and no cohesion funds are the maximum punishment possible under the EU constitution. That would require ratification by all other members though, so as long as there is one government (Slovakia being the most likely) blocking that, not much happens. That wouldn't make the point moot to take those steps. Governments change and the groundwork can already be laid for it, or pressure piled on the blocking countries.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

There is no way that will happen. Zuck bet large on Trump precisely for stuff like this. The FTC will be disbanded if they try to force this. More likely is that whoever doesn't do Trumps bidding will be fired until they find someone who does.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago

And then what? He will just ignore them, then stack the courts if not simply replace the SC judges. Who is going to stop him at this point? He got away with every single crime in his life, of which there are too many to count. He's ignoring court orders and ruling by illegal executive orders. Nothing but an armed insurrection is going to stop him now.

This ship has sailed and won't change course without a mutiny.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I work in automotive and sometimes visit the plants. We still have a lot of manual labor because it is hard to automate certain things. But newer production lines definitely require less people as more steps are automated. We also are starting up the implementation of robots in the warehouses after running several proof of concepts in the past years.

Anyway, there are still plenty of factory jobs that are not just sitting behind a desk, but office space is increasing for sure as one automation engineer can now run a set of robots that does the work of what 10 people used to do.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago

If they had stopped for 2 minutes between lines of coke to think about this, they would've realized this about a decade ago.

view more: ‹ prev next ›