ProfessorScience

joined 1 year ago

I heated up some soup that I made a while back and froze. I make some good soup!

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A 0x0 px jpg (trying to get an old webcam working, unsuccessfully)

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I live in the suburbs of a decently sized but not super large city in WI.

  • Convenience store: 120 m
  • Chain supermarket: 2.6 km
  • Bus stop: 5 m
  • Park: 450 m
  • Big supermarket: 3.1km
  • Library: 1.5 km
  • Train station: 58.9 km :(
[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh shit, we haven't? Do I... do I have to start saying stuff about eating pets?

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

When ChatGPT first started to make waves, it was a significant step forward in the ability for AIs to sound like a person. There were new techniques being used to train language models, and it was unclear what the upper limits of these techniques were in terms of how "smart" of an AI they could produce. It may seem overly optimistic in retrospect, but at the time it was not that crazy to wonder whether the tools were on a direct path toward general AI. And so a lot of projects started up, both to leverage the tools as they actually were, and to leverage the speculated potential of what the tools might soon become.

Now we've gotten a better sense of what the limitations of these tools actually are. What the upper limits of where these techniques might lead are. But a lot of momentum remains. Projects that started up when the limits were unknown don't just have the plug pulled the minute it seems like expectations aren't matching reality. I mean, maybe some do. But most of the projects try to make the best of the tools as they are to keep the promises they made, for better or worse. And of course new ideas keep coming and new entrepreneurs want a piece of the pie.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That does seem to at least help. It seems to be harder to trigger the problems with higher values. I could still get it to happen with the quant at 2048, but I had to really work at it.

I notice that the + Firefox line seems to show up with a quant of 900 even when the minimum value is higher than that? That seems weird.

14
Sound cutoff issues (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by ProfessorScience@lemmy.world to c/pop_os@lemmy.world
 

Hello! I'm pretty new to pop_os and linux, but am trying to switch over from windows. I've been having some sound issues where it seems like sounds get cut off. It seems to most noticeable with something like doing duolingo from my browser (lots of short sound clips of words and such; if I click on words quickly, then spotify playing in the background will stop playing briefly). I've tried disabling sleep, as described by https://support.system76.com/articles/audio/, without luck. I've also noticed that I see errors listed in pw-top which sometimes correspond to sounds getting cut off. That is, sometimes I notice a cutoff without seeing an increase in the number of errors, but when I notice an increase in the number of errors it usually corresponds to something getting cut off.

Is there a way to see what the errors from pw-top are? Or suggestions for other things I should look into? I've looked at dmesg and systemctl status --user pipewire.service (and pipewire-pulse) but the only error I see is a nvidia-drm thing which seems to be innocuous. I've also uploaded my alsa-info results, if that's useful.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Is this the Simpsons approach? "I'm just going to fire my chain guns like this, and if you get shot down it's your own fault!"

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Two spaces after periods.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (7 children)

The winner of the popular vote within the state wins the state's electoral votes. And Florida has a sizeable number of electrical votes.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

"Don't elect the other guy" campaigning is strongly incentivized by first past the post voting, unfortunately. Not that that's the sole cause, but... it's certainly not helping.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 80 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Doesn't take a "church boy" to not assault someone, dipshit.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, going from this example it seems like everyone should be afraid of good guys with guns.

view more: next ›