RoboRay

joined 2 years ago
[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

discourage drinking and thereby decrease the likelihood of handgun-carrying

correlation ≠ causation

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

An abusive culture doesn't make abuse acceptable. I'm happy to hear you got out.

I do read books for professional development, but while I'm sitting in my office during project lulls. I even keep them on my bookshelves, with The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck prominently displayed where I can point to it when I need to make a statement.

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

He should have stuck with his hot-dog cart.

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Flying out of Moscow and the plane goes down... what are the odds?

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Assuming the maintenance crews haven't already been mobilized and sent to fight in Ukraine.

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Accidental Superpower by Peter Zeihan is an amazingly informative and entertainingly written examination of how and why the US got to where it is without even really trying. This and his later books also discuss the rise and now beginning decline of globalization in a destabilizing world.

The guy (and his research team) has a pretty good track record of predicting geopolitical trends and even specific events that are coming 5 or 10 years down the road. I don't necessarily agree with or accept all of his ideas and analysis, but he definitely makes you think.

Wall Street Journal review: https://archive.ph/dFe6u

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

There’s no way to read them on company time so I ~~typically read them after work or on weekends~~ don't read them.

Company tasking happens on company time.

Don't simply accept abuse.

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

No, it actually hasn't.

I skimmed the other threads and it has all been thoroughly covered.

Y'all just seem to think people have "a right" to harass others.

You just seem to think you have "a right" to control others.

Nobody that you've blocked can harass you in a way that your demand to mute their account would prevent, Karen. Watch me prove it right now.

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I'm sorry, but you don't know nearly as much as you think you do. This isn't like Reddit. What you are asking for is not technologically simple, it would be trivial to circumvent, and perhaps most importantly, it's philosophically incompatible with the very concept of public speech.

If you are incapable of or unwilling to accept that, there's no point in continuing to attempt to explain this to you. It's all been addressed, repeatedly.

[–] RoboRay@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

How?

You can't send an email to another server and then command that server not to deliver it to the recipient. You can follow it up to request that with a recall, sure... but there aren't many that will actually comply. It's the choice of the server operator.

With federated public posts, there is currently no mechanism to say "show this message to everyone except Larry". And there shouldn't be, because it would dramatically increase processing requirements across every instance and also be pointlessly trivial for Larry to work around it.

You aren't in control of the internet... just your own little part of it. If you can't handle that, again, you're in the wrong place. There are plenty of top-down-controlled individual sites that already do that. The fediverse never will.

You can choose to not see what you don't want to see, but you don't get to tell other people not to read your public comments or to not speak. You have your rights, and they have theirs.

view more: ‹ prev next ›