[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is correct. I pay for the unlimited plan with Verizon, but it only has 5GB of hotspot data. I use an iptables rule to increment the TTL by one, giving me unlimited data on my laptop.

T-Mobile used to work the same way when I used it back in 2016.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 11 points 11 months ago

I would say that suicide is not patriotic to anyone. Why do Chinese supporters always resort to whataboutism, anyway? Shitty behavior is shitty behavior, regardless.

The PRC has never owned Taiwan. Also, it doesn't matter about the ethnicity of the population because, at the end of the day, they don't want to be part of China.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 16 points 11 months ago

What does this even mean? You're comparing cats and dogs in an attempt to justify PRC's warrantless claim to an island they've never owned in modern history.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 15 points 11 months ago

Officially. That's just political framing to keep China from going ape-shit. Unofficially, though... see the Six Assurances.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 13 points 11 months ago

I see what you're saying, but it is really easy to drum up support, especially with how effective the media has become at manipulating public opinion. I've seen the US go to war over much less in my life.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 20 points 11 months ago

Suicide isn't patriotic. And it isn't a Chinese island; that's the point. It's a democratic, independent country that happens to be a US ally.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

How do you know it isn't now? (see: Dead-Internet Theory)

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 29 points 11 months ago

What are they expecting to happen if they attack Taiwan? They'll start the next world war. There isn't a reality where the West is going to let them have it, regardless of how effective their "precision strikes" or suicidal their lunatics are.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 41 points 11 months ago

Journalists should be forbidden from using "blasts" in headlines.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 11 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that "exclusivity" attitude is the worst. I welcome anyone to the fediverse! The nature of the fediverse prevents any one entity from "fucking it up", as the image claims; if you don't like an instance or the instances it federates with, move to a different one that is more in-line with your values.

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 9 points 11 months ago

This would be so easily bypassed that the whole concept, while technologically cool, is completely useless. Someone could apply a very subtle smoothing filter and then do whatever they wanted with it after via stable diffusion (or use the myriad of alternative methods to remove the "protection").

[-] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 18 points 1 year ago

Pro-tip: you can block communities that annoy you.

26
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SIGSEGV@waveform.social to c/technology@beehaw.org

For those that don't know, Firefox has in-built support for automatically rejecting cookies and blocking the cookie banners from popping up.

To enable this feature, go to about:config, and perform the following:

  • change cookiebanners.service.mode from 0 to 2

To have this functionality in Private browsing mode, you should also:

  • change cookiebanners.service.mode.privateBrowsing from 0 to 2.

All Power to the People!

edit: (credit for this information goes to this lemming). Apparently, mode 2 means reject all or fall back to accept all if there is no Reject All button. Mode 1 only hits a Reject All button if available but ignores others.

view more: next ›

SIGSEGV

joined 1 year ago