What liberty are you talking about? The liberty of approved leaders? It's a failure because we voted for a bad leader?
We got the leader we voted for. The failure is in the people.
What liberty are you talking about? The liberty of approved leaders? It's a failure because we voted for a bad leader?
We got the leader we voted for. The failure is in the people.
Has there been any confirmation of this cease fire from any more reputable source?
I realize that's a low bar.
That's not my idea of liberty at all. But you can't say the ballot box failed, just because the people elected the worst president in the history of people in suits.
Also, that whole thing is nonsense of the highest order.
the only time I was ever hesitant about a vaccine was the smallpox vaccine that they brought out just as I was enlisting. It was widly reported that it was risky to take, as it contained actual virus, rather than just the recognition bits.
In retrospect, I have no idea if the reporting was accurate, misinformed, or fearmongering. But at the time, it worried me.
Because we don't want them doing surge pricing.
We dont want a military coup. People really need to understand this.
No, we don't. But I might prefer it to another three years of Trump, followed by whatever fascist replaces him.
If there is a third option, I'm happy to consider it.
Disagree. The DM should provide some sort of reason for the party to come together. Some sort of external influence, to bring in any characters that don't start the game together.
But it is the duty of the player to roll with it. Don't fight the plot hook. What's the point?
I could let her ambush me, if she was gentle about it.
This is an abomination.
Put it in the pile with the others.
Well, that's technically a more reputable source.
Can we move a few notches up the ladder, though?