Sandbar_Trekker

joined 5 months ago
[–] Sandbar_Trekker 2 points 11 hours ago

Nice! The main character was fairly consistent across the scenes. Still some improvements to be made, but keep up the great work!

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 3 points 11 hours ago

I think you're in the wrong community...

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Its probably better this way.

Otherwise you end up with people accusing movies of using AI when they didn't.

And then there's the question of how you decide where to draw the line for what's considered AI as well as how much of it was used to help with the end result.

Did you use AI for storyboarding, but no diffusion tools were used in the end product?

Did one of the writers use ChatGPT for brainstorming some ideas but nothing was copy/pasted from directly?

Did they use a speech to text model to help create the subtitles in different languages, but then double checked all the work with translators?

Etc.

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 3 points 2 days ago

Oh man, the times I could have used this. Thanks!

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The image for #3 isn't showing up for me.

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 3 points 2 days ago

This decision was made without the assistance of automation.

Suuuure. Exactly the kind of thing a crab would say!

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 2 points 2 days ago

The fight scene definitely needs some work.

No script/voices.

Most of the scenes turned out alright, just needs a little more to bring it all together.

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 30 points 4 days ago

In the U.S. they may even offer things like State Park passes.

 

Video that goes over some of the issues today with AI generated content and some attempts to prove something that's real.

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 56 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Given the trend of recent posts in here. I'm going to guess that the word "toxic" triggered the automod.

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Didn't we already have one last year?

 

Anyone else super excited for this?!

Expected release date is still "to be announced"Just don't look at today's date.

[–] Sandbar_Trekker 7 points 3 weeks ago

Too far would be anything outside of fair use. If a user generates an image of a specific copyrighted character, then attempts to make money off of that image, they could be sued.

You can't copyright a style, but there's still a lot of legal grey area here.

It's also worth noting that OpenAI has an indemnification clause in their Terms of Use. This means that if someone else goes after OpenAI for something that went viral and was created by a specific user, OpenAI can then turn around and bill that user for all legal fees incurred by them (whether they win or lose the case).

If anyone is into using AI for anything, I would strongly suggest that they avoid using (or at least publishing/posting about) any of OpenAI's tools especially while all of these legal issues are still being sorted out.

view more: next ›