You really don't want your president to be saying that he has no idea what's going on, generally not a good sign
However, provided that the Israeli regime stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no later than 4 am Tehran time, we have no intention to continue our response afterwards.
What the fuck is wrong with Iranian politicians? Why would the time at which the attack stops matter more to the response than the casualties and damage you endured during that attack?
You should be in prison for saying this. Purged. Gone.
Let's assume Trump is totally making shit up and trying to will a ceasefire into reality purely based on the power of his own words and it fails - what does that imply? That if Iran is seen "breaking" this totally invented ceasefire that something will happen? Will that "something* be some big escalation, like Israel assassinating Khamenei or something? Will it be the US announcing that they have to step back in again? That this comes right after Al Udeid is suspicious.
If true then Hamas and Ansarallah are shackled to a corpse
If true, then Iran is genuinely fucking insane. I said a week or so ago that I was becoming a China sceptic, and now I'm slingshotting the other direction. Sorry for doubting you President Xi, I can see why you aren't doing much to help a government that changes its entire foreign policy every two weeks.
I'm not gonna toot my own horn and be like "I saw this coming!" (especially because I'll look stupid if a ceasefire doesn't happen or it doesn't last and then Israel and Iran go back to war with each other) but I'll admit that I have had Bad Vibes™ ever since I saw the Iranian statements on the attack on Al Udeid and realized that had the exact same wording as their statements on Israel, y'know, along the lines of "We will severely punish the aggressors, they will regret ever touching us, there will be no aggression on us, we will re-establish deterrence," and I knew that that attack was just kayfabe, I was like, oh god. This is just corporate statement wording but with Iranian military statements.
An Iranian general probably gets insulted by somebody at a cafe or something and then they go "You shall never know peace on this earth, I will begin Operation Unending Justice to crush you and your collaborators, this is a duel to the death..." and then the guy says "Woah, sorry dude," and then the general goes "Ah sure, I forgive you," and then leaves.
I am anxiously waiting and hoping that Iran isn't going to do something incredibly idiotic, but after the last two years I can't instantly dismiss them committing some great error that gets a lot of people killed for no real reason.
if the US doesn't attack Iran after this AND Iran doesn't just immediately sign a ceasefire with Israel and commits to a war of attrition and pressure that forces Israel to stop the genocide, then this was a great strategic play by Iran
if the US does attack Iran after this then Iran has been pretty much objectively outplayed
if Iran decides to make peace with Israel after this then I suppose we'll be waiting for the war to resume in 10-20 years with a few million dead Palestinians, Lebanese, and Syrians and just hope that China is an unstoppable juggernaut by then and/or Iran has better leadership with fewer comprador moderates
I feel like the last couple weeks have been the exact opposite of this strategy, which is interesting.
The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal."
There was no good deal offered by the US and Israel - Iran merely wanted enrichment for civilian uses, as Iran is a big producer of radiopharmaceuticals and wants nuclear energy. 0% enrichment was untenable.
it would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be.
This was inverted by Israel launching an entirely unprovoked attack on Iran during a negotiation period, and every Iranian attack has been in response to an Israeli or US attack. There has been no aggression by Iran.
All this is an environment of watching a genocide committed by Israel is also a massive factor.
honestly the best case scenario for Iran
act like you're totally owned whenever the US strikes an empty site, let Trump go "Nobody can do it better than us! Our bombers, our missiles, our beautiful submarines - they just keep winning! Everybody can see it! Sleepy Biden wouldn't do it, Harris wouldn't do it, only a BRAVE and SMART president like me can do it! IRAN MUST SURRENDER!"
and every day take out some sensitive site in Israel or knock out a power plant
This is basically what I expected given that the base had been evacuated of aircraft days ago.
This sort of "relationship" between the US and Iran is very odd honestly, off the top of my head I can't think of any other two opposing countries that allow each other to conduct largely symbolic strikes with advance warning on each other. The closest situation that comes to mind is India vs China on the border, but that's just because they're both not really using weapons so it doesn't escalate very far.
My version has Chapter 17: Epilogue (2021): The Ending of Super Imperialism
A genuinely fascinating part of this conflict is that organizational military and economic power has been inversely proportional to the time it takes for those organizations to cry uncle
Hamas is the least well-armed and well-equipped and yet has been fighting for nearly two years straight with only intermittent breaks
Ansarallah, which might be more well-equipped than Hezbollah but less able to use all their power due to the distance, joined a couple months after the conflict began and has been fighting up to this very day
Hezbollah had tens of thousands of missiles and was brought to ceasefire in about a year
Iran is a giant state with (more or less) full sovereignty over its entire territory and with massive military production and (if the ceasefire rumor is true, which it maybe might not be? idk?) was brought to ceasefire in like, two weeks