Soyweiser

joined 1 year ago
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So we have this new tech that makes stuff up and also is a bit racist at times? Lets use it to monitor employees, of course it also trains to replace your job.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"You hate AI art? Well name all real paintings!" the blog post.

Also talking about the urinal "Art, it seems, is most meaningful when it challenges our very concept of what art is." No that was in 1917. Pretty sure that nowadays 'what is art even?' art is quite overdone and boring.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 3 weeks ago

For example, future pro boxing matches will be performed by rock’em sock’em robots

As predicted by several science fiction movies iirc. (I'm ignoring the skin suits because oof mental image).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Just needs a guy who goes "if we don't build the automated grooming machine, somebody else will".

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I'm just curious how many hits you would get if you searched for '4 hour work week', as iirc that is where all these people stole the idea from. (well, not totally, the idea they are stealing is selling others the idea of the 4 hour work week, but I hope you get what I mean, 4 hour work weeks all the way down).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 4 weeks ago

Well, at least they put down something. More than I expected.

And doing research on people? In this economy?

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Post by Corbet the editor. "We get it: people wish that we had not highlighted work by this particular author. Had we known more about the person in question, we might have shied away from the topic. But the article is out now, it describes a bit of interesting technology, people have had their say, please let's leave it at that."

So you updated the article to reflect this right? padme.jpg

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Watts has always been a bit of a weird vector. While he doesn't seem a far righter himself, he accidentally uses a lot of weird far right dogwhistles. (prob some cross contamination as some of these things are just scientific concepts (esp the r/K selection thing stood out very much to me in the rifters series, of course he has a phd in zoology, and the books predate the online hardcore racists discovering the idea by more than a decade, but still odd to me)).

To be very clear, I don't blame Watts for this, he is just a science fiction writer, a particularly gloomy one. The guy himself seems to be pretty ok (not a fan of trump for example).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 4 weeks ago

Hold it right there criminal scum!

spoilerImage of two casually dressed guys pointing fingerguns at the camera, green beams are coming out of the fingerguns. The Vegan Police from the movie Scott Pilgrim vs. The World. The cops are played by Thomas Jane and Clifton Collins Jr, the latter is wearing sunglasses, while it is dark.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But things being real doesn't stop the cranks. See quantum.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 15 points 1 month ago

Apologies for focusing on just one sentence of this article, but I feel like it's crucial to the overall argument:

... if [shrimp] suffer only 3% as intensely as we do ...

Does this proposition make sense? It's not obvious to me that we can assign percentage values to suffering, or compare it to human suffering, or treat the values in a linear fashion.

It reminds me of that vaguely absurd thought experiment where you compare one person undergoing a lifetime of intense torture vs billions upon billions of humans getting a fleck of dust in their eyes. I just cannot square choosing the former with my conscience. Maybe I'm too unimaginative to comprehend so many billions of bits of dust.

lol hahah.

view more: ‹ prev next ›