Different rant, but why are so many sites so slow? Loading times seem to have gone up, not down.
Please note this is rethorical, dont be like the sites asking me if I want to turn on notifications.
Soyweiser
joined 2 years ago
Wow ai usage does reduce your critical reading skills.
Come on dream bigger. This container ship is my diplomatic pouch. Ever Given declared act of god and sainted.
To steal and butcher Davids/Buttcoins (no idea who came up with it) slogan. 'they are explaining it wrong, but no they can't be that stupid right?'
I have not read the article yet, but isn't part of the whole accellerationism thing that you accelerate the decline of the current system so your glorious new system can arise (because it is obviously better). Seems to me like it is the same stuff, they just disagree which faction will prevail after the fall.
E: amazing they only now realize they cant galt gulch it out, and that they are part of the world. Damn evil Ents, this is why your wives left you.
Yeah their site is so badly coded it happens to me at times as well. Which says a lot of things.
This reminds me of how allround crazy person Scott Adams also claimed he successfully predicted Trumps first win. But he didnt. He predicted a landslide win, and not him losing the popular vote. That last part people forget when they claim he predicted it correctly. Figure kot of that going on here with the Rationalists claims. Predictions like this are easy to go 'well it didnt happen for the reasons I thought and also did not happen totally as i said it would, but I still got it correctly'. Esp as they want to be superpredictors. (And yes we also do it, but we are not a group who pretends to be anti bias rational trained supernerds as a larger project).
[Epistemic status: gas giant sized contrarianism, negative gravity]
I mentioned this on bsky and somebody went 'well it was very popular all over the world', and I, the weird european who focuses too much on the US politics had not even heard of it. So I just had a few alarm bells going off. But yeah, lets say 1 in 5 people like it, that is a casual 1.7 billion viewers. Large part of the worlds population joined in.
That would explain a lot and would remove all my confusion about it. (also makes the number useless and lol at everybody running with it even more then).
slabs table
This is is sea peoples erasure and you know it! Damn liar!
"Imagine a technology so useless you cannot run doom on it" https://bsky.app/profile/sosowski.bsky.social/post/3lm63a2srgc24