NASBLOL (I'm not sure this abbreviation will work out): "Investors in anti-Biden cryptocurrencies are getting absolutely destroyed." (Source)
Soyweiser
joined 1 year ago
Yes indeed. Which is iirc what people talked about re ML before the current hype cycle started.
Have not read it yet, but seems relevant to our collective interests. NSFW due to NASB. Accelerationism, amphetamine philosophy, and the Death Trip. (A long post about Nick Land).
Lol at trump in golden thigh high shoes btw. Somebody needs to bonk the datasets a bit. (E: Im joking here, nothing wrong with a horny dataset).
Not stately enough.
iirc Crowdstrike does use regular ML for security, or at least a lot of security companies, I think they might have talked about it on the risky business podcast, so you might want to look at their (many iirc) crowdstrike sponsored parts. No episode directly springs to mind however.
No idea how true it is but apparently crowdstrike fired some of their QA and replaced it with AI, anybody heard about this? (source bsky) (Also 'AI' is doing a lot of work here, that could be anything)
Please get 4 more diseases to get cancer treatment or buy the seasons pass.
Amazing how many of them eventually morph into somebody else. Trained on celeb faces, and still cannot keep a consistent facial shape. One more dataset bro.
Logging bug report, patient died despite trying to enable god mode.
Most programmers are programmers
Technically correct the best kind of correct.
This is the kind of take a libertarian makes, and then goes 'well nobody debates me on this so my logic is solid'. While he isn't noticing that people are just avoiding the conversation all together, as nobody wants to roll in that mud with him.
The UR example of these kinds of bad takes is the book "Defending the Undefendable", a dumb book I have ranted about before.