Good question, only the most politically active would, so self-selection is definitely at play. Therefore this does not respect external validity through a non-overfitted model, and we can't use these results to generalize about the greater public sadly.
Can't really reach any conclusions from the trends shown due to that.
I know you're engagement-farming, but "too"*.
How in hell did your rational take get downvoted... The Lemmy hive mind is certainly just as bad as Reddit's.
You sound 12, no offense. It's also "prize", not "price", within the context of what you said.
Font is unreadable for anyone with glasses.
"Ceci" si tu veux être précis
Since when is a Nobel prize winner admitting they were wrong and did not know enough any sort of "proof" that a whole discipline is not real? Get off your high horse...
I studied economics, none of it was purely psychology, and it was quite intense mathematically. It seems people conflate the discipline with business courses and assume it is just buzzwords and wishful thinking. When it is based on empirical data and experiments, just look at fields like how data science is applied or econometrics...
You're all thinking of business. Economics is an empiric field of study that is based on science.
Downvotes while being right, the hive mind churns I guess. Man are you people idiotic.
1 looks the most balanced to pen spin with the least egregious lapel.
...
I literally just corrected someone else about the opposite mistake.
"prizes"*