Surdon

joined 2 years ago
[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

No, you are completely right, but it's kind of the same with the "we are living in a simulation" thing (there isn't really a functional difference between a God's imagination and a simulation).

A more interesting question to me is not where we came from, but if there is an endgame. Created 5 seconds, 500 million years ago, 'real', or just avatars in a superconsciousness, the question remains- is there a "RIGHT" way to use our agency and experience?

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

It always annoys me how hard it is for me to make people understand this. I often debate the concept of spirituality and Gods in general, and people (in the US) always reply with some response like 'but catholic church bad.' Which, sure, I'm not disagreeing, but is such a narrow viewpoint and doesn't exactly have anything to do with the possibility of a God or Gods existing.

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I mean according to some religions he was the one who told people to put some clothes on in the first place

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I'm a dog person, but I agree, for the most part. Nobody should have to put up with wild, untrained animals in public places. That's kind of the point of civilization- taming and controlling nature. Untamed dogs do not belong.

That said, I think properly trained dogs are less offensive than most people. I do my best to train my dog, and I actually think she still has a long way to go. (She is very obedient, but being young, has a very short attention span and requires repeat commands to stay focused.)

The average training level of dogs these days is simply atrocious. I went out for a walk on a trail that allowed off leash dogs, and several people told me how shocked they were that my dog always came and stayed by my side when I commanded her to "heel" -frankly, this is disturbing. I consider a reliable recall the BARE MINIMUM for a dog.

"Good" dogs are usually the most predictable, reliable things in their environment

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

My sister has a young German Shepard and he is the laziest, sweetest dog ever. All he wants in life is to lay in the sun and chill. He can't be bothered to get up, much less jump on people

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Depends on the dog. They have different personalities just like people. Currently one of my roommates has a yappy, untrained little terrier that never shuts up if he isn't given attention 24/7. The other girl I live with has a blind doxen that is like a quiet, cute little roomba- he just wanders around silently and bumps into walls. I have a firm belief that NO ONE likes untrained dogs, and it is animal abuse not to train your dog well

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I think that's the real problem, they often shove tragic, supposedly heavy backstories on us with no time devoted to actually developing it and giving them weight- we are TOLD to care, instead of given actual reason to. If the movie can't invest in their backstory, why should I?

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nah it wouldn't make him a liar- it isn't necessarily an attempt to fool humans, in my opinion any God capable of doing something like that did it for their own reasons, not as some cosmic prank

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I mean the "fool unbelievers" thing is stupid but also it's not really unreasonable that if you could speak things into existence and did so for cosmic entertainment or whatever that you would make it at the point that it's actually interesting. Like if I was going to make people I probably wouldn't start with infants, I would start with actual independent ones. Likewise I wouldn't start with an infant universe

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

An ex of mine would keep a tissue to spit it out in. I know it's a personal thing but was always weirdly hard not to be a little offended. Like I doubt a girl would love it if I immediately grimaced and spit after going down on her. I don't really expect bj's, but to me, it's all psychological, and apitters kinda ruin all the fun.

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I haven't done formal research on the topic, but as far as I can see this is correct- alcohol just lowers your inhibitions and makes you more suggestable, therefore easier to influence by your enviroment- you're way more likely to be depressed and sipping whiskey slowly by yourself than partying with Coronas with lime.

It would be interesting to look at regional ideas of what different alcohols are appropriate for and see if the "effects" change with it

[–] Surdon@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Idk about uncommon, but definitely not universal or common enough that is surprising when they don't

view more: ‹ prev next ›