just a form of ideologically flavored ad hominem?
Ridiculous statement for someone who incessantly calls the most predominant socialist tendency on earth a "religion."
Edit: also lmao poli sci and economics degree
"Excuse me, the only real socialists are people with professional level liberal ideological education"
Of course literally none of the libs in the comments are willing to engage with this comment.
anarchism as fascism is?
I think your reading comprehension is poor, or you're referring to something outside of this thread. This is definitely not allowed in Hexbear.
Horrible line of reasoning. Anarchist projects have all reverted to capitalism much faster than the Soviet Union did.
The way you liberals need to define ideologies the US government taught you to hate as "religions" is pretty interesting to me.
It's wild because this is a joke but I've literally seen this conversation on blue sky.
"Vote blue no matter who doesn't apply to him"
"Well he wasn't vote blue no matter who for Kamala so fuck him"
Impossible to satirize.
: it's not easy being hot pink
Is this image recolored because if not he should go to a hospital immediately right?
Also, God damn I love some Disco Elysium skill posting
They will literally never side against Nazis, it drives me crazy. Then they just define their enemies, who are often fighting against actual neo-nazi US proxies, as themselves being Nazis. Maddening.
Yeah, very weird to have a bunch of countries with Nazi pasts start planting landmines, after we agreed as a species that they're an extremely dangerous and immoral sort of weapon, and then blame it on Russia.
The USSR was also destroyed by encirclement and (nearly 100 years) of pressure from reactionaries.
But again, you and and the people on the comm you named after yourself are the ones hypocritically positing that any socialist project that fails is evidence that that project's ideology inevitably leads to capitalist takeover. None of the "tankies" on Hexbear are saying that because it's asinine, but if you actually believe it, to be ideologically consistent, would require condemning anarchism also.
Deeply unserious