Uniquitous

joined 2 years ago
[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 9 points 4 months ago

Which they might well do.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 49 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Half of them are broke as fuck and the other half are heavily invested in oil company stocks. Elon made a poor choice of allegiance.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Gods damn the spineless dems for caving into this shit.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 3 points 4 months ago

That's assuming the private sector had sufficient jobs on offer to absorb the flood of suddenly available people in specialized disciplines.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Dems are so incredibly useless. Probably doesn't help that plenty of them are just fine going along with this nightmare. They've got theirs and their corporate donors don't want the boat rocked.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 19 points 4 months ago (5 children)

DuckDuckGo offers a nice relay service; you get a duck.com email address that mails through to your regular email, but it strips out all the trackers and other bullshit. It's good for situations like that.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 211 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Welp, my days of not buying Dodge cars seem to be coming to a middle.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 1 points 4 months ago

And yet, here we are.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 4 months ago

The French wouldn't have let things get nearly this bad in the first place.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I doubt they'll be on the front lines. It'll just be the poor shooting at each other. The only real solution is Luigi, until they're scared enough to negotiate in good faith.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 4 points 4 months ago

Ooh, they can even have their own currency! But what to call it... something brief and punchy, to underscore all the efficiency... I know, we can call it "scrip!"

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 3 points 4 months ago

Knowing them, if they do they'll immediately stab themselves with it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›