UraniumBlazer

A reminder for the uncivilized savages from a very civilized gentleman with a sweet smelling asshole: WASH YOUR ASS WITH WATER. USE A BIDET OR A BUM GUN.

Why are Americans okay with shooting up schools but not ok with shooting up their own assholes?! Bum guns also don't require reloading! You can fire as much as you want! Use Bum guns 👍.

DON'T DO THIS:

• Soften chocolate ice cream and chill the glass. Take the ice cream out of the freezer for 10 to 15 minutes before use. At the same time, place your glass in the freezer. This will keep the shake cold when you serve it

-Measure the ingredients. 1 cup ice cream to 1/4 cup milk is a great ratio.

• Blend the shake. In a blender, combine the milk and ice cream and blend until smooth. Add any your mix-ins and blend them in to your desired consistency.

• Measure out the special secret ingredient - the 32.7 days, fermented cum sauce. Remember to consume 250 grams of pineapples prior to producing 100ml of that precious, pearly goodness.

• Remember this: No matter how yummy the cum sauce looks, DO NOT DIP YOUR DISGUSTING HANDS TO LICK IT. You never know where your hands have been touching.

-Serve. Pour the shake into the chilled glass and serve immediately.

• Remember to enjoy this with your family! Cheers! :)

But idk tho...

U could still easily evade this. Here's why:

Ad is inserted into stream. Either one of two things happens depending upon the way it is implemented:

1. The length of the video stream increases as the ad is inserted suddenly. The ad blocker can simply calculate the difference and skip the difference worth of time, thus skipping the ad.

2. The length of the video doesn't increase to prevent this. Thus, you get the ad stream overlapping in front of the actual video stream. This would thus kinda be on the frontend, which could easily be blocked.

3. The ad is inserted in the beginning itself at some random time in the video. Hence, the length of the video doesn't change suddenly like in scenario one. However, remember that regulations require you to visually indicate that a given piece of media is an ad or not. This is why YouTube ads have "Ad" in a yellow box. This could thus very easily be detected by an adblocker that analyses every frame that the box is present in, and skips that frame. This however, would be a little heavier for the user using the adblocker.

Trust me lol. There is literally no way you can prevent ad blockers.

In video ads = no relevant ads based on the user. Less relevant ads = less revenue generated for people paying YouTube for hosting those ads. Thus, people would pay less to YouTube to host ads. Thus, less profits for YouTube.

Plus as another dude said: Sponsorblock.

YESSS!!! I HAVE AN ENTIRE MANIFESTO ON DIGITAL DIRECT DEMOCRACY!!! The only part that stumped me was how it could be stateless (I was confusing "state" with "government").

Yea, cops do tend to be grumpy little assholes. I was talking about the police force from a theoretical standpoint. If someone was breaking into my house, I would need to call for help, right?

Okay now this is the answer that I was looking for! This makes perfect sense! For me, "state" and "government" were synonyms prior to reading your comment. So basically, the communist utpoia is a world devoid of institutionalized coercion.

To answer my question, a space program could definitely work. The only thing is, all scientists would be working voluntarily there. No scientist would become homeless if they decided to stay home for the day.

Well, the communist utopia is stateless, no?

Ok, so then would be correct to say that the communist utopia is a sort of singularity (consider y=1/x, where x=0). It can never be achieved, but the goal should be to get as close to it as possible. We will never achieve total post scarcity. However, we can achieve post scarcity for things like food, shelter, clothing, healthcare, education, then probably internet access, smartphones, video games and so on.

We can never eliminate institutions of authority, but we can reduce their presence as much as possible. For example, we can never eliminate the police force, as there still would be some sociopaths who we would need protection from. However, as society would progress, crime would drop such that we would require smaller and smaller police forces.

So in conclusion, am I right in considering the communist utopia as a singularity?

No I get the communist utopia. As I said, I believe it is supposed to be a society that has achieved post scarcity. I can easily see humanity reaching that stage soon enough (relatively). I just can't understand how statelessness is involved here.

Awwww you too!!! <3

Hehe guess what.... Nobody exactly knows how gravity works.

So let's start with Newton. According to his equations, gravity is a force. Why? Well, according to the first law of motion, an object stays in motion in its original direction till a force is applied on it. Newton said, "Gravity is clearly actively changing the direction of an object. Hence, gravity is a force". As Newton establishes that gravity is a force, we say that it "pulls" objects. However, he couldn't explain the mechanism behind this pulling force.

Then came Einstein. According to general relativity, gravity is not a force. How's that possible? Doesn't gravity change the motion of a given object? Nope! Wait, whaaaaa?! Okay, so according to special relativity, all things in the universe are on a "spacetime". What's a spacetime? Well, it's a four dimensional fabric like thingey that all objects are present on. The four dimensions are time and the three spatial dimensions that we experience. Mathematically, there is no difference between time and the spatial dimensions. However, all objects move only in one direction through spacetime at c, ie., lightspeed through spacetime. If an object moves at c through space, it moves at 0 m/s through time and vice versa. This is how you get the time dilation magic. Cool. Now what if we bent this said spacetime at certain points? The object traveling on this spacetime would be traveling in a straight line always. Hence, no force. Hence, no pulling. Hence, no pulling mechanism.

Cool! So we solved gravity, right? Sike! GR doesn't work at the quantum level...... Aaaaand most of the best models that we have for quantum gravity use a particle called the "graviton", which has a field that results in an attractive force. How does this force work? The answer is "go fk urself".

Hence, in conclusion, noone knows whether gravity even "pulls" in the first place, let alone HOW it pulls. Aaaaand we've been trying to answer this question for almost 100 years..... Cool....