Nazis are all in on vegetarianism.
This is totally not an attempt to make a bad faith argument against vegetarianism btw.
UraniumBlazer
joined 2 years ago
Absolutely correct decision. YouTube is just so incredibly poor. They really need money guys. In fact, we should set up a donations page to support this great organization that totally respects its users and artists while being very strict against spam, dangerous misinformation and state funded propaganda! /s
Eating food in cars is just something I find to be SO REPULSIVE.
- Cars have that plastic-ey smell.
- Cars make ya motion sick.
- Food gets EVERYWHERE when u eat it in a car.
- No matter how hard you clean, those food crumbles stay somewhere in there, which then mix with the plastic-ey car smell.
In other words like GPUs. GPUs suck ass at complex calculations. They however, work great for a large number of easy calculations, which is what is needed for graphics processing.
Oooo so this is future Florida where women wear Christian Hijabs
Was FDR really a democratic socialist? I know about New Deal, but still...
On a side note, a dem soc doesn't force cooperativisation of a corporation, no? Is there any specific political ideology that talks about workers seizing means of production via this manner (the state forcing businesses to become cooperatives)?
Exactly. I felt the people here being a lot more hostile too (aside from the nicer instance like the furry instances or Lemmy.blahaj.zone)!
Yea, most people (here and on Reddit) argue in bad faith without knowing that they're arguing in bad faith.
Let's say u see some statement that u agree/disagree with. The goal should be to reach the truth. Whether you are right or wrong doesn't really matter. What matters is if u've reached the truth. A bad faith argument is when u argue to prove that you r right for reasons other than getting to the truth.
I've seen many ppl just write their hypotheses without any further explanations. It's rlly rlly annoying when these guys r just like, "yeah, but it IS this way" without any evidence, without even any explanations and so on.
Ideally one should exit bad faith arguments, but still... It's rlly annoying.
Maybe it's someone who just happened to be hanging around
Yea yea, the potions guy ikik... I was talking more in terms of the name. The Sith name that is. I've seen ppl say "Qimir" quite a lot.
I'm more interested in seeing him kill a couple of the unnamed Jedi. Hopefully they handle it better then the first fight scene.
Oh I'm definitely expecting that to happen. I rlly doubt any Jedi is getting out of there alive including Sol. Sol did the cliche "I'll tell u what happened when we get back", and then dying.
The Sith? fellow clearly is eyeing for Osha. Maybe he manipulates her by re-emphasising the lie that Mae killed her family? Perhaps trapping her into sunk cost by making her kill Mae?
WHAT AN EPISODE!!!
Episode 4 was absolutely amazing! The acting has improved (the conversations between Osha and the padawan girl felt incredibly natural). And do I need to talk about the ending?
SPOLIERS AHEAD
How was the Sith? guy at the end so fkin powerful lol. One flick and he can send everything flying away? Jeeez... Also, is this guy Mae's friend? Uk, the one accompanying her everywhere. Would explain how he got there so fast. Also, what is his motivation to set Mae up? Does he just want to kill a few Jedi? Does he want to turn Osha to the dark side or something (uk, after seeing how he eyed her and didn't kill her)? Isn't Osha actually weaker in the force when compared to Mae? I've so many questions lol. Also, props to the designers of this character! His mask is SO CREEPY.
Really can't wait for the coming episodes.
Oh yeah... I srsly wonder who the Sith? master is lol
Ummm this was Marx's idea (kinda)...
This technically fits under libertarian socialism. I wanted to know if there was a specific name for this particular thing within this (like anarchism is a subset of libertarian socialism).