UraniumBlazer

joined 1 year ago
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago

Same my friend.... Same.... :(

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Why, u don't like it? It's a little convenient, no?

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago (12 children)

I still didn't get why we stopped calling it CP instead of CSAM or CSEM or whatever it is now.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Awh... Such a cute song...

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 30 points 9 months ago

I would do the same and I'm a man. War is bad. People die in war. I don't wanna die. So you can go die OP.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Ahh... Forgot that this story was in shithole Tennessee.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, in my original comment I did mean that. But one commentator gave the statistics of genetic disorders for kids born out of first cousins. After researching that a little, I changed my mind and wrote about it in a reply to that comment.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

But deciding to continue with the pregnancy after your protected sex fails is reckless. You know your child is going to have a 50% probability of having severe genetic defects. If you still continue with the pregnancy, it is equivalent to feeding your child cocaine.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It shouldn't be. I was referring to direct family incest, where the risk of genetic disorders is 50%.

view more: ‹ prev next ›