UraniumBlazer

joined 2 years ago
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

The cunts and bhenchods in one empire? Never seen that before!

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -5 points 11 months ago

I mean... That's just like saying that noone would want to be trans because society would be asshole-ey to you...

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Okay, what I meant was "how is this acceptable". More like "how is this normally accepted?" or "how is everyone just okay with this".

But your answer does provide very valid points for the causal points behind this.

And I bet it helps with SEO which probably means that an English title can increase your income.

Makes sense. Which makes it so scummy! Inconvenience thousands just to gain a few more views...

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

The reason for the ratio is because this is very close to a pedophilia apologist viewpoint blurring the lines between attraction and consent.

I don't understand. Do pedophile apologists say that consent isn't necessary if one is attracted to kids or something? Like those rape defenders who invoke nature to say "rape happens in animals, hence there is nothing immoral about rape in humans"?. Sorry if I come off as a little dense. I am unaware of this viewpoint (in fact, I've never really discussed about this topic with anyone before).

If they are an adult with the body of a twelve year old, why would another adult be sexually attracted to them (their body)?

Cuz they're likely a pedophile. But this wouldn't be immoral as the other party has all the knowledge and experience of a consenting adult.

At what point is the line between respecting an individual's autonomy to present as a minor, and sexually objectifying actual minors?

I imagine that minors are sexually objectified either ways. Like... A pedophile probably thinks of some kid while masturbating, no? How's that different from having sex with an adult who looks like a kid?

Because it is very easy to read the original post as "nah, it's not pedophilia, they're technically legal!"

But that is what it is a little, no? Forget legality, I'm talking more on morality grounds. According to my definition of pedophilia, you would still be a pedophile if u were attracted to kid-like people. But in this case, consensual sex would be permissible as no damage is being done to anyone (as both parties can consent).

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago

We got people out there that orgasm from popping balloons

WHAT. I wanna see porn of that lmao. Like... Do they moan n stuff when they hear balloons popping? Or would they orgasm after hearing gunfire considering that sounds similar sometimes? Would they be horny constantly in a warzone??? I have so many questions...

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I do not follow. What are mangakas?

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I think it will likely be yet another group being attacked for daring to live their lives.

The upvote/downvote ratio for this post scares me already.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

Hmm, I can see that happening. Altho how would something like this be enforced? Plus is it ethical to tell consenting adults how they should have sex? If you're talking about porn, we could see disclaimers like these. But would they even be effective? Wouldn't they be more like the "confirm you are over 18" popups?

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This argument could make sense if the very existence of democracy was not in question. Trump is an openly fascist candidate who is now out for revenge. There might not be a next time for the Democrats to correct their mistakes.

Getting progressive candidates in the Democratic primaries is what is necessary.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've never had a toilet choke up, and have neither heard of any such stories in my vicinity. Is this a US thing similar to the cardboard walls stuff?

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wow, now I'm so confused? Like... Why is he pointing at his wristwatch? Is it to note the time down like they probably did for baking shit?

"Put 1kg ocra in her pants for 30 min and it'll turn ripe."

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Perhaps to avoid false positives? I think it's telling the minor, "hey, this might be a dick. Open only if you trust the person".

view more: ‹ prev next ›