[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

At least you went, my guy. You can, without a doubt, say "that's not a thing I like". I have never done a cruise because I don't think I would like them, and don't want to be stuck in a boat for 3 more days after I find that out. Will I miss out on cruises? Probably not. Will I talk myself out of other things I might have actually enjoyed? Almost certainly.

It's important to push boundaries and try new things, but it's important-er to learn from those experiences and grow, even if the only "growth" you get here is the confirmation that trying a new thing might suck, but won't kill you.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 48 points 6 months ago

My boy Aristotle thought men had more teeth than women, and whatever testable hypothesis he created to prove that fact didn't include, you know, counting the teeth of men and women.

Don't get me wrong, I love the guy, and will agree that "classical elements" is probably the dumbest thing to accuse him of being wrong about. Hell, I have considered getting a Bekker number tattoo, but he was definitely full of some shit. It's okay to acknowledge he was right about some things and wrong about others. That's the whole point of this thread.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

A coworker of mine was recently bragging about their new electric mustang and its zero to sixty time. "Have you ever gone zero to sixty?" was my only response. Of all the facts and figures, 0-60 has you to be one of the least important when buying a car.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Trademarks aren't patents. If your art team worked to choose a specific color, and your brand relied heavily on it, it would be easy for someone else to trick customers into buying your version if it wasn't trademarked.

It only applies to that very specific color, and it only applies within your market sector, which seems fair to me. If I started making Kadberri chocolate in the same purple wrapper, they'd be right to be upset.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 61 points 6 months ago

Has the creator of this ever been to California? "Beach community" is not how I'd describe the northern half of the state's coast...

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

There are two routes to go here:

Science route: kidney stones are largely made of calcium, oxalate, urate, cystine, xanthine, and phosphate in our world. Presuming dragon physiology is roughly the same as our world, there's nothing inherently special about these elements in game. Short of "reliquary" type of usages (think finger bone of a saint), there's no reason to think it is special. Considering dragon scale is used in armor, I have to assume any less exciting dragon "parts" would pale in comparison. Might have value as a trade good or interesting conversation piece to the right collector.

Fun route: this chunk of phosphorus can be used 1d8 times in place of normal phosphorus from your material components pouch, upping the damage die of any [fire] spell cast using it.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

High fees, inconsistent/false advertising, burdensome chores? When was this article written, 2017? This has been the state of Airbnb for half its lifetime. There was a year, maybe two, at the very beginning where it truly was "crashing at your friend's place", in the same way Uber was "getting a ride from a friend". Both have become full time corporate institutions with wage slaves pushing a product that's somehow worse than the original problem (generally due to the lack of regulations around these "gig economy" alternatives), at the detriment of communities and others who attempted to make a living "playing by the rules".

At this point, if you're using Airbnb, not only are you impossibly ignorant of the problem, you're actively contributing to it.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

Evasion plus, on average, a better Dex save than armor class.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

*Nicholasnames

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Started a job in July I was 60% qualified for. By December I had made enough changes to the job description (by adding things I was able to do that prior people couldn't), my manager decided to reclassify my job. New title, new description, new salary pay band. Manager hands me an envelope with my new title, description, and rate of pay. I say "thanks, but we just created a job that I'm 95% qualified for. I expect to be in the 95% qualified section of the new pay band, but this rate is for the 60% qualified. We go back and forth for three months. With 1 hour notice he calls me into a phone meeting with his boss where I can state my case for a proper raise to reflect my new duties.

Big boss says "we don't negotiate raises, you were hired at 60% qualified, you'll stay there, and get 1-3% raises annually based on merit. If you want a raise, find another job." I did.

Last I heard my job was filled by one of my subordinates who was maybe 30% qualified. The good news is the job was kind of a joke, so I'm glad one of my old reports was getting a huge raise to do essentially her same job, because even my boss didn't understand the changes I made, and they were instantly forgotten when I left.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 381 points 11 months ago

I can fathom no world where you'd want to trade away a multi billion dollar brand for a new brand you literally can't SEO. What, you think your brand is gonna be more impressive that the generic variable, and a part of the alphabet?

"Follow me on Twitter" becomes "follow me on X"? "You should tweet that" becomes "you should X that"? The little blue bird on every shop window, website, and business card becomes a stylized letter that, hopefully, doesn't look so threatening on the next iteration?

It's a textbook case of brand destruction. I almost regret never making a Twitter in the first place, just so I could quit today, or at any of the hundred days in the past year where it got inexplicably worse without reason.

[-] User_4272894@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

I've worked places where fixing what's broken was actively frowned upon. Short sighted employees will confuse "why do I have to learn X" with "I'm making more work for everyone" instead of realizing "doing X will take 10 hours to learn, but save one hour a week forever".

These are not places you want to work. You're lucky to be free of them if this is the situation you were facing.

view more: next ›

User_4272894

joined 1 year ago