It's conspiratorial that Google gets ad clicks through Firefox, and pays Mozilla some of the money it makes from that?
And I suppose it's also conspiratorial to claim it's doing the same for Safari users - instead it's more likely that it's paying Apple 20 billion a year to remain out of the clutches of regulators?
Imagine if all the hours spent shitposting on Lemmy was spent on a single distribution.
The ways people enjoy spending their time are not interchangeable. Or in other words: https://fosstodon.org/@bragefuglseth/113183569977642462
I mean, the extension system means we could easily fix it
If that's the case, then why not do it? Apparently the people who actually worked on X11 had a different idea, and so they decide not to do it themselves - but the code is right there for those who do think that that's a good approach.
Likewise, there are plenty of definitions of "better" that make Wayland a lot better. It's just that it's a lot of work to make something better, especially for some interpretations of "better".
The authentic French translation of forking.
And where did that Google money come from?
(It's a rhetorical question of course: it came from Firefox users clicking on ads.)
How do you think Mozilla was funded before Fakespot and Anonym were acquired?
Pullout game? I don't pull out, I just rawdog that sex!
Wait.
It's a real shame the process for the previous logo wasn't followed again. I liked the previous logo, too.
Oh damn, jouw gezin heeft echt niet de loterij gewonnen he...
Maar zeker, als je merkt hoe lang het duurde voor de enorme misstanden in de gesloten jeugdinrichtingen in het nieuws kwamen (en ik denk dat dat nog steeds niet is opgelost), dan verbaast het me niets dat er nog veel meer niet in het nieuws is.
Yeah I was just elaborating on your point.