WalnutLum

joined 9 months ago
[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 5 points 19 hours ago

The newest TikTok trend and thus drug problem seems to be centered around galaxy gas. And they seem to know what they're doing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiebBVQBulI

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Main thing the US gets from Israel is Market Capital Export.

Israel accounts for what, like 30-40% of all recent American acquired startups?

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think Steam does have enough influence to be able to pull a sizable chunk of users away from windows.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

It seems like a very polarizing game, you either really enjoy it or not at all.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I love the division 1 and 2 but the first game had some MAJOR bullet soak issues for the first half-year of the game's lifetime.

Massive always does good work despite Ubisoft, in my opinion.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago

Biggest issue I see is that these LLMs tend to repeat themselves after a surprisingly short number of times (unless they're sufficiently bloated like ChatGPT).

If you ask any of the users of Sillytavern or RisuAI they'll tell you that these things have a long tail of not being very creative.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's important to take Tesla and SpaceX at face value and not to extrapolate future success based on what they've accomplished.

Edit: for anyone that follows SpaceX's current shenanigans, seems like they've been using the FAA to scoot permits to launch without proper authorization from other agencies (notably the EPA)

Shit is getting VERY juicy: https://fixupx.com/RepKiley/status/1839066996274516417

They've even got representatives just kind of going along with their demonstrably false narrative for the ride.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Oh, yes but the DRM exemption clause means that you can backwards engineer the changes and continue releasing them under GPL

Edit: as an example we should probably be looking at the duckststion situation evolving right now:

https://vimuser.org/duckstation.html

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"releasing the modified version to the public" would cover them re-closing the source and then subsequently releasing that newly closed source, so they can't relicense it and then release the built version of the code.

At least not easily, this is where court history would likely need to be visited because the way it's worded the interpretability of "modified" in this context would need to be examined.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Do you mean finetune data?

A model's configuration data is training data.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What do you mean by "configuration data?"

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Recent studies suggest the science on this is less clear than that TED talk suggests. So I wouldn't put too much emphasis on either the idea that automation will or won't take away net jobs.

view more: next ›