2016 anomilies were differences between exit polls and results specifically in some swing states. Different anomoly. Not saying 2016 was definitely fraudulent, but seems worth double checking if you want to pretend to be a republic/democracy.
WalrusDragonOnABike
joined 6 months ago
Nothing was done based on the shady 2016 election outcomes, so I doubt anything will happen this time either.
You could do vote totals for president vs vote totals for the next highest state-wide race (or break it down to more locally) without looking at the party those votes went to. It wouldn't prove that the huge number of bullet votes were specifically in favor of Trump, but at least would suggest some wrong-doing, even if the result of a recount lowers Harris votes.
Still, there's surely lots of other races where one candidate is clearly awful, yet bullet ballot rates are still <1%.
Maybe betacam?
spoiler
Best of luck! Guessing it is becoming more normalized (idk, my 6 month appointment was just over a month ago), so hopefully some more rigorous science will come out soon and make it easier for people to get it if they want and to know what they're opting into.
We just need to create an army of like 10 Ash-like super-posters and we can break 10K comments!
Always funny looking back to when you thought trans people were cool, but you were unfortunately not cool enough to be trans.
Yes, but only if its pee pee related.
when will my nipples stop looking so weird??
There's such thing as non-weird looking nipples?
spoiler
got my 6 month catch up in Jan, would that be a good time to ask about prog? i don’t want to come off too eager but… well i am
Depending on the provider, they might just ask if you want it (mine did). There's no reason not to advocate for yourself imo.
Doctors told her she would be unlikely to carry the child to term, and doing so increased her chances of infection or other severe outcome.
When the law is a witch hunt not based on science, doctors cannot operate based on their best judgement based on science. Real issues of "unlikely" and "increased her chances" aren't the same things as immediate medical emergency: they prevent an immediate medical emergency. Any law restricting abortions to when they are "medically necessary" will always lead to cases where its denied until its immediately medically necessary, at which point it may be too late. This is a clear-cut example of what such laws will always do and doctors being forced to tiptoe around the feelings of fanatics instead of being able to practice medicine.
That's meant as a compliment, right?
view more: next ›
Seems like this is from people who (claim to have) demonstrated how it could be done on the hardware used in the election as part of their professional careers, are showing the data suggesting something like that was done, and are reaching out to officials to get a recount, which would be able to prove something was done to alter the results. Seems like demanding recounts is what should be done, just like in 2020.