[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago

I was interested in it but at the end of the day Dorsey got Twitter into its initially mediocre state, and he's endorsed RFK Jr. as well as Musk's purchase of Twitter. So should I really expect it to be any better? I'll keep an eye on it but my expectations aren't terribly high.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

The goal isn't to create successful states, it's to create politically safe states. Doesn't matter if the state crumbles as long as that crumble is red.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 76 points 9 months ago

Not just US interests, but European and Ukrainian interests as well. There was a multi-national effort to remove Shokin. You think Joe Biden orchestrated all of that to get his son a cushy board membership? It's laughable.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

"If you work for part of the day you still get the day off" is certainly an...interesting perspective.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago

The Greeks figured this a couple thousand years ago and we're just now catching up. SMH!

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago

Couldn't have happened to a prouder boy

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

The incentives of capitalism and the intended role of the 4th estate are not compatible. Stoking the flames of populism is simply too lucrative of a business model when compared to trying to keep the public informed. This is what allows perverse media groups to proliferate and dominate the public eye.

I don't think this is an easy problem to solve. If you're able to successfully regulate things like Fox, does that fix it, or do people just start gravitating more towards alternate media like Joe Rogan? Do you start regulating podcasts too? Twitter influencers? I feel like it'd just become a never-ending game of whack-a-mole. And given that the 4th estate's role is to check the government, how do you use the government to safeguard it without giving them too much control over it? It's a difficult balance to strike.

That said, clearly we aren't striking that balance now, so perhaps it's time to try something different.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago

Part of what makes religion so useful, to suffer becomes virtuous.

1101
submitted 10 months ago by WorldWideLem@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Somehow this is the only country on earth where this seems to happen. When talking about shootings involving guns, okay, fine, the US is certainly an outlier there, but every country has cars and police.

This is murder.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago

This is the fruits of the GOP strategy that's been going on for decades to strengthen their support through Christian believers. The Pope is just recognizing the impact of that from the religious side, whereas Barry Goldwater warned of it's impact from the political side.

Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.

It certainly is a terrible damn problem, and we're knee deep in the shit right now.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago

Probably exactly what has been reported. Putin waited for things to settle, weakened Wagner troops by taking their weapons and splitting their numbers, then they killed leadership. Occam's razor certainly points to this.

But, of course, the way it was done certainly leaves the door open for conspiracies.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

Group A was wronged by entity B. Group A goes to court to seek restitution from entity B. Courts rule that entity B did in fact cause damages to group A and must be held liable.

That's all reparations are. Entity B is your government. It's the same legal entity as it was 190 years ago, regardless of the composition of the population it represents. If a group was wronged by their government, this is their only means to legal restitution. Unfortunately since the primary form of income for some governments is taxation, it means people complain about paying for things when that's not exactly what's happening.

The alternative is to say that if a government "runs out the clock" and is able to avoid responsibility until the population turns over, then they can no longer be held liable for anything they did prior to that point. That's not a very good position, in my opinion.

[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

I think they're suggesting an aggregate feed from some number of concurrently logged in users.

view more: next ›

WorldWideLem

joined 1 year ago