I don't think if you can wake with an http request but after either a bios/kernel setting you can do wol mac:add:re:ss from a different computer.
The key restrictions here is not every hardware supports wake-on-lan, and one computer must be configured to "wake" the other.
Maybe it's just bad edits, a filter, and a very practiced speaking stance. But there are very clearly multiple edit jumps. I've seen longer AI footage have those clear jumps where multiple videos are stitch together. Like you take a starting image, generate a video, then take the last frame and use it to generate the next scene. But this video does look like an edit more than an AI stitch. Like Trump has a resting pose and returned to that after flubbing a line.
With Luigi they tapped some illegal surveilence resource then did parallel construction to fabricate "legal" evidence (ie the backpack with everything in it). The shooter was probably as cautious and more practical(?) given the range of the shooting.
Odds are it takes them 2 weeks to commit to a suspect.
More likely he just looks like shit.
That video is absolutely AI. Fucking PKD Penultimate Truth shit.
"Remarkable" is a better word because its very credible. Its extremely clear evidence of censorship.
I was hoping to attend a working group meeting today but now I'm afraid I'll keep grinning and giggling like an idiot.
What you're describing is really not a viable business proposal. You can't have a telecommunication platform "developed for you". You could have the mobile app developed for you, but thats usually just a custom XMPP client. The servers absolutely cannot and that's the real product. Those need physical infrastructure, and constant maintenance. You're looking at Indian experts overseeing the physical construction of the servers and actively training Nepalise to maintain the system. And if the Nepalise want to develop it further (which they must) the Indians must sign copyright over to Nepal.
Maybe the UAE could swing that sort of contract but I doubt they would bother with it. They'd probably just license the software so they have some local control but a foreign government maintains ownership over it. At that point forcing the private company to make a local branch that is subject to your laws makes more sense and that's what Nepal tried.
Isn't the point to avoid outsourcing it to a foreign power? Idk if India has a competitor to WhatsApp like China does with WeChat.
The solution should be to release your own chat app as an alternative and provide every incentive to get people to move over to that app before blocking the foreign apps. However I'm not sure Nepal has the resources to in house a competitor to WhatsApp.
Went the whole day feeling like I was forgetting something.