[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago

That is not how time dilation works.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 day ago

That is not the adrenaline, that is the endorphin rush, your brain is rewarding you for surviving.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 days ago

Get a boox, runs android.

You can even install the Kindle app. But seriously, there are bunch of good ereader apps.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago

It only seems compelling, there is no base rate of non-similar twins separated at birth. Is this 1 in 2 sets end up like this, every one, 1 in 100,000?

The neuroscience is interesting, but it is not in any way predictive. It is all post-hoc rationalisations of what did happen.

As I said above, I'm an engineer and look at this from a physical sciences point of view. There is no model (as far as I'm aware) that can predict what will happen except in very specific psychological experiments.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, I am 100% on that.

If A causes B, that is true for all observers. Otherwise you get into causeless actions.

Imagine observer 1 (O1), sees one rock (A) crash into another (B) and it changes it's direction of travel. O1 has on opinion on the sequence of events.

How imagine observer 2, (O2) watching the same events from a different perspective.

There is no situation or perspective O2 can take which would have B change direction before the collision with A.

Therefore no matter their perspective both O1 and O2 agree on the sequence of events. Thus causality is fundamental.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 days ago

The two men had married wives with the same first name and had similar interests and hobbies.

Similar <> identical.

This story has little to add to the debate about free will. How many identical twins separated at birth didn't have similar lives?

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago

You can have situations where person 1 sees an event happen as A B and person 2 sees that same event happen as B A.

This is only true if A and B are not causally related. If A causes B all observers will see A causing B.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 days ago

That is all well and good.

I'm an engineer, so I look at this from a physical sciences point of view. The main problem with the "no free will" argument is it provides no predictive power, there is no model that can say person X will do Y (instead of A, B, C or D) in situation Z.

What is possible is giving probabilities of Y, A, B, C or D in experimental settings. But in the real world, there are too many variables interacting in a chaotic manner to even give reasonable probabilities; this is why we can only use population level statistics rather than individual level predictions.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago

Sapolsky's perspective ignores reality to generate talking points.

Just because a person has a limited set of choices, mostly determined by upbringing does not mean that we can predict any future action based on previous actions.

At best you may be able produce a chaotic model that gives probabilities of potential actions in any situation.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
  1. The universe is almost definitely not infiinte, but we will never be able to prove it.
  2. Have you heard of vacuum decay?
[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 7 points 4 days ago

The guy seems fine after treatment.... Not a great experience though.

23
submitted 5 days ago by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/rocketlab@lemmy.nz

Pretty cool interview with Sir Peter

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 19 points 5 days ago

This is a wand of friends (with benefits)

1
submitted 1 month ago by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/rocketlab@lemmy.nz
58
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/dnd@lemmy.world

I am running a Tabaxi rogue that is currently 4th level.

In a recent fight, purely to piss off the leader of a band of thugs, my character ran in the 20ft and lifted his gold pouch (lucky roll 19, for a total of 26), then proceeded to bonus action disengage. The feline agility racial ability allows me to double speed for a round, so was able to disengage to a distance of 40ft.

The DM was totally ok with this, I didn't actually do any damage and I "wasted" my turn for flavor and fun.

I get that you can't use slight of hand to perform a disarm, but what is are your thoughts on lifting daggers/arrows/spell components etc....which are not being held by an enemy?

This could be very OP if I'm allowed to steal a wizards components pouch, rendering them significantly less of a threat.

1
submitted 2 months ago by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/newzealand@lemmy.nz

Are there any legal experts that want to weigh in on this.

Can the police in New Zealand force unlock your device with your biometrics?

How does this work with NZ law?

1
submitted 2 months ago by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/rocketlab@lemmy.nz
1
submitted 2 months ago by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/newzealand@lemmy.nz

Heard this on the BBC news podcast today, they reference our attempt....that we have given up on.

1
First post (lemmy.nz)
submitted 3 months ago by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/rocketlab@lemmy.nz
27
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/linux@lemmy.ml

The freezing happen approx once per day, seems more often when connected to my android mobile hotspot (may be unrelated).

"journalctl -p err" gives:

nvme 0000:03:00.0: AER: Error of this Agent is reported first
pcieport 0000:00:02.4: AER: Error of this Agent is reported first

The nvme error, happens approx 10x more often.

I am running a WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Firmware: 624281WD

I tried the WD website to see if there is a FW update, but there are only windows/mac tools and no link directly to the FW (that I could find).

System info:

OS: Linux Mint 21.3 x86_64
Host: Zenbook UN5401RA UN5401RA_UN5401RA 1.0
Kernel: 6.5.0-17-generic
Uptime: 14 hours, 59 mins
Packages: 2662 (dpkg), 60 (flatpak)
Shell: bash 5.1.16
Resolution: 2880x1800
DE: Cinnamon 6.0.4
WM: Mutter (Muffin)
WM Theme: Mint-Y-Dark-Purple (Mint-Y)
Theme: Mint-Y-Dark-Purple [GTK2/3]
Icons: Mint-Y-Dark-Purple [GTK2/3]
Terminal: guake
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H with Radeon Graphics (16) @ 1.400GHz
GPU: AMD ATI 64:00.0 Rembrandt
Memory: 5198MiB / 15220MiB

Update: it seems that the updated firmware has solved the issue, I have been running 4 days without a crash. Thanks to @rotopenguin@infosec.pub for pointing me to the Framework guide.....why is this not on the WD website and easy to find.

31
submitted 7 months ago by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/linux@lemmy.ml

When trying to capture an area of the screen; specifically a Firefox extension; the context menu disappears when I press Ctrl-Shift-PrintScreen

I am trying to write a little guide for some workmates, this is making it very difficult.

33
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/dnd@lemmy.world

I have been thinking about making wildshape more fun, this is partly the fault of the “Honor Among Thieves” movie.

Wildshape should be more like a resource pool that grows with your character, similar to sorcery points or ki points.

Here are the mechanics of the change: You get a number of hours based on your druid level (moon druid Lvl+1). Using wildshape costs time based on the CR of the transform (min 1/4hr). You can transform as many times as you have time left. The time you can stay wildshaped is based on how much time you have left. The pool still resets on a short rest.

e.g. 1 - Non-moon druid. Could transform into CR0,1/8 or 1/4 for 1/4 hr each at level 2, a total of 4 times. Or for 3/4 hr twice.
e.g. 2 - Moon druid. CR1 transform for 1/2 hr, twice. At level 2.
e.g. 3 - Moon druid. CR0 (mouse) for 1/4hr, CR1(bear) for 1/4 hr, CR1 for 1/4 hr.

e.g. 4 - Level 5 Moon druid. CR1 for 1/4hr, twice, CR0 for 3/4hr, CR1/2 for 1/2hr, CR1/4 for 1/4 hr.
e.g. 5 - Level 6 Moon druid. CR2 for 1hr twice.

I’m still debating weather or not to give the +1 hr to moon druids.

The main thing I’m trying to do is avoid the “wasted” wildshape feeling, I don’t want to hesitate to use this awesome feature to keep the resource for a potential later battle.

So what do you guys think? Will this break the game? I am testing this with my DM, but if it turns out to be too OP then we will dial it back. Or potential go back to standard.

6

Always saying login failed.

I'm using a password manager, to the username and password is correct.

14
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz to c/dnd@lemmy.world

EDITS

Well after going through with character creation and talking to the rest of the crew. I am still going to go with the Druid/Barbarian build but with some changes for flavor.

My character is now a one armed shifter, named Beck. Rather than the bear, I will now lean into the one-armed nature or the character and wild shape into primates/apes. I made a CR1 Gorilla (upgraded CR1/2 Ape) based off off the BlackBear -> Brown Bear upgrades. This is so that for a time at least he can feel "normal" and have two arms and hands.

I asked Chat GPT to expaned on:

Druid with rage issues, he tries to suppress his rage but it doesn't always work. He didn't really fit in with the others at the druid enclave that he grew up in.

A large part of the general anger at the world is that he is a Shifter and has lost his left arm, Shifters are generally looked down on and the fact that he is missing the lower part of his left arm leaves him feeling that others think he is broken is some ineffible way.

ChatGPT response:

Background Beck was born within the tranquil confines of a druidic enclave nestled deep in the heart of the ancient forest. Surrounded by the soothing whispers of nature, he grew up under the careful guidance of the enclave's wise druids. However, from an early age, it was clear that Beck was different. His Shifter heritage marked him as distinct from the others, and as he came of age, his physical loss only furthered his sense of isolation.

Personality Beck's heart is a tempest of conflicting emotions. He carries a deep connection to nature, feeling most at peace when he communes with the spirits of the forest and takes on the forms of animals. He tries to embody the teachings of the druids, seeking harmony and balance. Yet, beneath the surface, a simmering anger lies, triggered by the pervasive prejudices he's faced due to his Shifter heritage and his missing arm.

Rage and Transformation When his emotions reach a boiling point, Beck's attempt to suppress his rage can fail spectacularly. In those moments, his connection to his Shifter ancestry becomes undeniable, and he transforms into a raging force of nature. His remaining arm gains a primal strength, and his eyes blaze with fury. He becomes a whirlwind of ferocity, tearing through adversaries with the raw power of his emotions.

Journey and Quest Beck's path leads him beyond the safety of his druidic enclave. Driven by a yearning to prove his worth and overcome the limitations society has imposed on him, he embarks on a quest to uncover ancient secrets hidden within the depths of the world. Along the way, he forms unlikely bonds with fellow adventurers who see past his differences and appreciate the strength within him.

ChatGPT end

So the goal over the adventure is to have him realize that the limitations that he thinks society has placed on him are actually his projections. Once he accepts that his differences don't make him weaker or less in any way, he can be happy in his own skin. If he doesn't accept this; the wild shape could become an addiction and he will blame it on only having one arm.

Note He didn't lose the arm in some accident or anything, he was born with it the way it is. The druids in the enclave couldn't heal it as there was nothing to heal.

ORIG

I am starting a new game, for once I am going with a front line kinda build. Plan is to go from L1 - 15.

So I have chosen the Shifter - Wildhunt - specifically for the ability “no creature within 30 feet of you can make an attack roll with advantage against you”

L1,2 - Druid - Circle of the moon.
L3,4,5 - Barbarian - Path of the Totem Warrior
L6 - 15 continue with Druid (probably)

Pros and cons L1 - 5

Pro - Level 2 Bear with me here…I can be a bear that can not be ganged up on
Con - 1 round to wind up, shift and wildshape
Pro - Level 3 Barb gives me Unarmored defense, this is crazy good with wildshape
Pro - Level 4 my raging bear will be able to attack recklessly and never have the down sides.
Con - a long wind up to get to Shifted/Raging/Bear 1.5 rounds.
Pro - Level 5 - resistance to everything except psychic attacks…usually Wiz save - so my high wiz druid helps a lot there.

The cons are mostly negated if the party isn’t surprised. Unarmored defense makes this crazy…I have ~~high Wiz~~ reasonable Con ~~because of druid~~ and reasonable Dex…

Edit: too many times playing monk.

Also reading through, I need to get to at least L6 druid, gives CR2 beasts and primal strike.

view more: next ›

absGeekNZ

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF