airrow

joined 9 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didn't think this was possible but I wish you good luck with it

 

You can't disprove flat earth theory... or can you?

 

The Break key is a keyboard key whose original purpose was to immediately halt execution of a running a program. On modern computers, it has no default function. It is not commonly used, although any software may use it for its own purpose. The Break key may also be remapped with a program like AutoHotkey.

 

We will all have seen disabled people who do not have the use of their hands, attempting to communicate using 'unicorn sticks' or even eye-tracking technology. I considered this and wondered if the simple Makey Makey board could be pressed into service to provide a quicker and lower-cost way to replace a mouse and thus facilitate a whole host of ways to communicate.

We all know how sensitive and controllable our tongues are. We can easily send our tongue to any tooth and the tip can easily determine items as small as a piece of trapped food or even a human hair.

Since many disabled people still have the full use of their tongue, it occurred to me that it may be possible to put together a mouth controller using the Makey Makey interface to connect to an onscreen keyboard.

Was brainstorming some ideas like this and found something that already exists that I thought was interesting to share

 

https://freenet.org

The centralization of the internet poses a fundamental threat to individual freedom. In 2024, a few corporations control most internet services and infrastructure. These corporations wield immense power over most of us with little accountability, enabling them to censor content, exploit our data, and exclude users from services they depend on —all with profound implications for democracy. We need a solution urgently.

Introducing Freenet — a decentralized replacement for the world wide web. Acting as a global, shared, decentralized computing platform, Freenet can either be accessed via a standard web browser or integrated into third-party applications.

 

Something I was experimenting with, making a list or "inventory" of all the "stuff" (physical or non-physical / digital) in your life, in order to make better use of it

Some "stuff" has been haphazardly acquired in my life, as gifts or things I've gotten without a plan on how to use them, or digital files I'll get to "one day"... having a list of these things makes it easier to actively manage them (get rid of unused / unwanted stuff, make more regular use of things I have that I may not use much that I want to use, etc.)

Anyone gained any insights from making an inventory of "stuff" in their lives?

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well but so what's to moderate disagreements between Atheist A who believes one thing is right versus Atheist B who believes some other opposite thing is right?

 

The Ironwood bicycle is a wooden framed bike that people could make themselves with commonly available materials. It has a laminated wooden frame and fork to which standard bicycle components are bolted. The frame can be made with basic carpentry and metalwork skills, without the need for welding or soldering. The design is intended for small scale bicycle production that would support local employment as an alternative to importing bicycles from around the world. More: http://www.ironwoodbicycle.com.

 

I've heard this claim before that it is not possible for atheists to have "objective moral beliefs" because many moral claims are based on religious authority, which atheists do not believe in.

Thus atheists are subjectivists when it comes to morality: each atheist may disagree with the other about what is moral. Obviously this opens atheists up to problems of disagreements, with some who might believe very conventionally "immoral" things are acceptable for them.

This is not of course to say that atheists may not choose to live lives that are some what "moral" (moral, as is often defined by religions)

So, what's the status of the idea of "objective morality" and atheism?

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 7 points 4 months ago

there's the indieweb movement, smaller sites trying to have fun, like neocities

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

lots of [removed] and [deleted] and way too many sub rules

it's hard to know if just going to lemmy or trying to improve reddit are better strategies (or some other reddit alternative)

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 4 months ago

scarred for life, but you just focus on other things

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 5 points 4 months ago

I was going to guess racially based comments about crime in detroit idk

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com -2 points 5 months ago

indeed, 'tis poison for body and mind...

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 4 points 5 months ago

mistake is relying on bing's servers?

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 7 points 5 months ago

the problem is "intellectual property" existing at all, just get rid of it entirely and make everything public domain

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 28 points 6 months ago (6 children)

also too much: [deleted] [removed]

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

there are some alternatives popping up like drone light shows (which can do some interesting displays fireworks can't?) and if they got popular enough maybe people wouldn't feel a need for fireworks as much

[–] airrow@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 6 months ago

this is censorship and not thought to be sensible moderation by a lot of people

view more: next ›