amzd

joined 11 months ago
[–] amzd@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We disagree on the fundamental premise. If you see an animal on the side of the road in pain, do you leave it be?

I don’t think we disagree on that point.

[health related arguments]

I don’t think we’ll agree here nor do I think it’s fruitful to argue it because in my environment I’ve heard that saturated fat is the devil and the main cause for heart decease which is the second most prominent cause of death only trumped by cancer, while you are stating it as a healthy thing. I don’t have the time to research this nor do I think health is a valid justification for harming animals.

you have to start with a point of common agreement.

I don’t think so for the Socratic method but for making friends, which is what this post is about, that makes sense. From your expression of wanting a more humane way to slaughter, and desire to euthanize a suffering animal I am assuming we can find common grounds in that direction.

Would you agree that animals can suffer and are you against animal abuse?

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

The document

Okay let me rephrase again. In your opinion how much time from knowing they are going to die to actually losing consciousness would you think is quick enough to be considered humane?

Regardless, what is the best method of [slaughter]

Since eating animals is optional during all stages of our life (say all major dietician organizations), I think that we have no justification to take someone’s life. So the best method of slaughter is none. Animals are here with us not for us.

that keeps the meat usable?

I believe the best use of flesh is when it makes up a living being.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lmao if AI companies are gonna pay the middle man and not the actual content creators I’m gonna snap

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Cows don’t die to a captive bolt, they usually don’t even lose consciousness from it. It’s basically like a lobotomy, it makes them less likely to resist and kick while being strung up.

How much time from knowing they are going to die to actually losing consciousness would you think is quick enough to be considered humane?

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Page 52 has all the steps you want in extreme detail.

I was asking what you personally think. (Repeatedly)

Linking to guidelines is such an “industry spokesperson” way of talking. I was hoping to have a bit more friendly/informal conversation.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I meant like the steps. Would you use a knife or a gun or?

The text you quote seems to misuse “humane” which means showing compassion. How do you compassionately kill an animal that doesn’t want to die? Is there some specific step that makes it compassionate? Or do you only kill the ones that are sick and dying?

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Can you describe how you humanely kill an animal?

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Good carnivores who can afford it will try to find sources of ethically raised and harvested meat

How do you ethically “harvest” meat? And why are you using a plant term for this?

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Sitting at the dinner table while family, people that I thought compassionate and logical, eat flesh.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Curious what you think the reason is?

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] amzd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Might want to try Nobara which is basically fedora but it installs proprietary gpu drivers on first boot

 
 

[…]

Joined by XMPP-messengers Cheogram and Monocles, and supported by many contributing experts in the background, we are playfully addressing the no-billionaire-platforms challenge with webxdc, a container format and API for “chat-shared web apps”. Technically, webxdc apps are network-sandboxed HTML5 apps and instead of the HTTP protocol they use Peer-to-Peer send/receive APIs implemented by webxdc-capable messengers, rebasing relations between developers and users by saying

  • Bye Bye to surveillance capitalism: Users have both the code and the data of their web apps in their hands and benefit from end-to-end encrypted messaging not only during regular chat messaging but also during their private web app usage.

  • Bye Bye to user policing (logins, passwords, OAUTH, TOS and privacy policies etc.): Web app developers never obtain or touch any user data or user identities, and can have peace of mind of not being responsible for any data, and not having to program identity management and social discovery UIs. Messengers already provide it through arranging chat groups or rooms.

  • Bye Bye to depending on a corp or org that enshittifies: Messengers, as decentralized runners of webxdc apps in chat groups, can not hold web app developers, their users or data hostage. Consult Cory Doctorow’s “Ulysses Pact” for why this is a good idea.

This all sounds too good to be true, right? But what if another reality is possible by just stretching out our hands and grabbing it?

[…]

157
[OC] (lemmy.world)
 
view more: next ›