antonim

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

...but man, am I bad at math

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

someone’s insane ramblings about the new world order.

We still have plenty of that, everywhere from Twitter to 4chan.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

It varies, because YT periodically breaks it, but it gets patched up again usually quickly.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Man I completely forgot Gmail chat existed, and I used it for a while quite regularly.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Previously you claimed that using the Gmail domain is "extremely unprofessional". However, a company that considers email addresses with real names to be more professional is "petty". 🤔

 
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

The “actual” story/plot (message?) only really came together after watching a long YouTube video (actually, I read the transcript / script as a blog post so it wasn’t as long for me to get through it).

Can you link it? If you still remember what/where it was...

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

it’s something that you’re actually supposed to think about while watching it

Says who? IMO the strongest aspect of Lain is the vibe (style, sound, art, the whole world). The overall narrative is jarringly structured, a bit chaotic, with sudden introductions and resolutions of subplots, and especially on the first watch it's futile to try to treat it as some sort of a (solvable) puzzle, or, even worse, a philosophical tractate. Not that it might not be treated that way on a rewatch sometime down the line (though honestly I wouldn't expect that to be possible even then), but the first time around it has to draw you into the world and into Lain's mind. Just relax, make yourself comfortable, and let it be an irrational, intimate experience that it's probably meant to be. (Or, well, don't, if you've already given up.)

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

the small minority of retards did the salute

The words "za dom spremni" are the salute, and everyone participated in that, Thompson initiated it.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There was little to no actual anti-communism at play at that point (although it was still relevant symbolically). Both sides were already capitalist. Yugoslavia had been on the path of liberalisation for quite a while before the breakup.

Btw, that excuse that Thompson and his fans regularly use is bullshit, the phrase was picked by Croatian extremists (especially the paramilitary HOS) in the 90s because it was used by ustašas (fascists) half a century earlier in the first place.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

unless the ustashe independently invented it

They did, they weren't instructed by German nazis on what words to use. Not that it makes any difference, ustašas were just the local variant of fascists.

 
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's true. But people pointing out that the whole attempt is absurd and senseless also reinforces the point that current AI isn't what companies tout it as.

then you likely live in a bubble of tech nerds

Well, we are on Lemmy...

659
conclusions rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Forum#Update_on_the_UK_legal_challenge_to_Online_Safety_Act_categorisation_rules

Hello everyone,

My name is Phil - I work in the Wikimedia Foundation’s Legal department, and I’m here to provide two updates on our legal challenge to the UK Online Safety Act’s “categorisation rules”. Those rules are written so broadly that Wikipedia could be lumped in as a “Category 1 service”. This would subject it to extra duties under the Act that could seriously impact the privacy, safety and empowerment of the Wikipedia community, and our collective ability to sustain the Wikimedia projects. For background on the OSA and our legal challenge, see here (Diff), or a more detailed post here (Medium).

First, an administrative note: the High Court has agreed to expedite our case, and set a two-day trial next month: July 22-23. We expect the hearings to be public, and can be observed in person at the beautiful Royal Courts of Justice in London.

Second: the Foundation will be joined in this case by a Wikipedian, as joint claimant. User:Zzuuzz, a longterm UK-based user, will play a pivotal role in articulating the human rights implications of this case, including for your rights to privacy, safety, free speech, and association.

I hope you’ll join us in expressing deep appreciation to User:Zzuuzz for volunteering to take this extraordinary step, and standing up for the Wikimedia movement worldwide. This might be legal history in the making: our early searches haven’t turned up any legal precedent of a website’s host and its users proactively joining forces to bring a legal challenge.

We’ll aim to provide further updates on Meta, and we’ll watch discussions for a few days in case there are questions we can usefully answer. As this is a critical moment in active litigation, we apologise for not commenting as freely as we’d like. Best regards,

PBradley-WMF (talk) 08:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

 
 

Image A shows Bosnian Cyrillic as used in stone inscriptions.

The columns go: Latin (BCMS) alphabet - Greek - Cyrillic "church letters" - Cyrillic "civil letters" (Peter the Great's reform) - Bosnian letters: 14th, early 15th and late 15th century, typical forms

For context, the BCMS alphabet mostly corresponds to the same IPA symbol, with only these exceptions: Gj /d͡ʐ/, Ž /ʒ/, Lj /ʎ/, Nj /ɲ/, Ć /t͡ʂ/, Č /t͡ʃ/, Dž /d͡ʒ/, Š /ʃ/.

Image B shows various examples of handwritten cursive Bosnian Cyrillic.

This variant of Cyrillic was used in modern-day Bosnia and parts of Croatia (Dalmatia and Dubrovnik), mainly from 14th to 17th century. It used the letter "djerv" <Ꙉ> for /t͡ʂ/, which eventually became a part of the modern Serbian Cyrillic alphabet as <ћ>.

Images from Frane Vuletić's Gramatika bosanskoga jezika (1890).

 
 
 
view more: next ›