Flatpaks are good, especially compared to snap.
The future is atomic OS's like silverblue, which will make heavy use of things like flatpak.
Flatpaks are good, especially compared to snap.
The future is atomic OS's like silverblue, which will make heavy use of things like flatpak.
Tell me you don't understand what you read without telling me.
What a stupid take.
I'd say look in a mirror and sit down, as you entirely don't understand this proposal. This is not something that impacts old hardware.
Xlibre is run by a very unstable and shitty person. Pass. Just let xserver die
I legit thought I had stumbled into a shittysysadmin thread for a moment.
There is legitimately no reason to use snap for this.
Especially when this utility is a single fucking 217 KILOBYTE standalone binary.
Just download it from github and toss it in ~/.local/share/bin
If anyone is wondering the connection:
This guy had internships at the Heritage Foundation and did some service as a special assistant in a DHS immigration office.
Heritage foundation strikes again with installing young puppets.
Vlc does not meet the wife approval factor.
Your goal is antithetical since even without tracking the LLM is still absorbing everything you say to it.
If you're concerned, just run a local LLM and skip the web service one.
Meanwhile trump is trying to just kill easy access to Narcan to save people.
So I'm sure in a few years we'll see numbers climb again.
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? Maybe don't just toss around non sequiturs.
You just move to user directory installation of most tools via brew on Linux. It's not difficult. The Bazzite distro handles all this incredibly well via brew, flatpaks, and distrobox.