I think Lemmy has very few users to have such limitations.
balder1993
joined 2 years ago
The mental model I have about performance is that the higher abstraction usually beats the lower level abstraction.
So in that sense, a well architected software with proper caching, multithreading where it matters etc. will beat badly architected software (ex: one that brute forces everything). Then, that being equal, good algorithms and solutions beat bad ones. Only then faster runtimes make more of a difference, and at the bottom things like more efficient processor architectures, more efficient compiler etc. beat slower ones.
A good example is Lemmy itself, which as far as I know was made in Rust to be super fast, but then at the beginning was being DDOSed quite easily because of the way the database was designed and lots of queries were very slow. Once they fixed that, Lemmy became actually usable.
“Any improvements made anywhere besides the bottleneck are an illusion” (Gene Kim)
It helps to look up certain concepts in the Wiki (Arch Wiki is probably the most complete and well explained) as you come across them. The idea is to increase knowledge little by little, but over time it compounds.
I mean, the way I see it he also has an economic incentive to endorse more AI everywhere.
On the other hand he seems to be one of the people actually pushing for saner legislation.
First thing I install in each platform is fish
Seems like it allows self hosting as well. It seems to have more stuff indeed.
It isn’t a native UI, but the effort made to look native on each platform must be appreciated.
This is very useful. I think I’ll stick with it.
As much as I do like programming in Java, you have a good point.
What about accessibility?
If I was gonna make a suggestion, it would be to use some formatting tool such as black to make sure your code is styled in a standard way.