beeng
You're missing the point. If the program doesn't do what it's meant to its YOU that didn't use the tools between you and metal, correctly. LLM involved or not, it's how you've described it, in whatever 'language' you chose (natural or Rust)
Anybody that doesn't write binary is lazy, said the compiler.
The skill beyond your native tongue is knowing what a db does and how to describe what your app does. Aka a designer, with design language. Good luck with a LLM getting it to do what you want with no domain specific language.
"No, no, not like that, I meant bigger...."
You write machine code?
No, you only describe what you want the compiler to write in machine code.
With copilot it's still a description.
Go, you get small static binary, easy to code, and good performance.
I watched a few episodes, it but it hurt too much. (:
This hurts, it's so good.
When do you do the choosing? Try move that left in the process. Saving storage.
Depending where you use it, but often tables are available in markdown.
| markdown | table |
|---|---|
| x | y |
|markdown|table|
|--|---|
|x|y|
Fixed..cos you could only see rendered and not code.
7.5g is a fairly weak cup. An espresso is typically around double that.
Why wouldn't a compiled program match your description (code)? The compiler is broken?? Compiled programs alwsys match their description(code).
So more likely your translation from idea to function is wrong.
Re-read your description, step through it slowly, what did you assume, that was wrong, or where did you add a mistake or typo? Sounds like I can do this in natural language or in Rust.
You can say that llms are not deterministic of what they produce, but that's got nothing to do with making a programmer worse at their job.
If you can't translate your idea into function and test its output to be what you want, then you are a bad programmer.