You guys are the protection from cops? Brother, they dress up like you to throw bricks through windows as excuse to go after the rest of us.
Now you want us dress like you so that the media can then take the cops side when the fighting starts?
You are not our protection and we are not your cover.
It appears 1833 is when Massachusetts formally adopted their state constitution, so that is likely the reason in.that case, hut I will look more into it.
When anarchists and tankies are dressed that way at protests, it isn't possible to tell whose side they are on. Are they there for civil rights, or are they right wingers (or even undercover cops?)
I also don't buy the argument you guys make good protection at protests. Against who? The cops? Every person who goes to a civil rights protest knows the history, they know the risks, and they go anyway.
That single sentence in a body of work you acknowledge agrees with me isn't a very good smoking gun.
Jefferson was the ideological head of a conspiracy to steal land and autonomy from a theocratic state. I also believe some of the first laws enacted by the warring colonies was that Anglican churches were no longer allowed to swear allegiance to the king.
I don't know why its 2023 and there is still this active fight to reframe the creation of the US itself as a Christian act.
Were any of those States allowed to keep their state religions after the ratification of the constution or did they immediately start following the law and separated their recognition of a church being the state religion?
But yes, the constitution outright was outlawing the formation of theocratic arms of the state.
Yes, but in the US we don't make our leader the head of a state religion when they take office.
What?
If you have 1 child born in 1995 and another born in 1999, then your children are of two separate generations.
I'm not interested in changing your feelings on the subject, so I think the discussion is finished if you aren't willing to have the discussion meet a bare minimum of decency.
I'm quite comfortable in what I have given and continue to give in the fight against fascism. Thank you.
I am underestimating none of those things. I fully expert lone wolf nutcases to continue their plots. I'm stating that the organizational infrastructure that was there to help guide them during the Trump era is now gone.
I understand a continuation of a grand conspiracy is somehow more comforting than the reality that fascist movements are already plotting what post-trump action looks like, but I assure you, the grand conspiracy stage is finished for the moment.
Every large city in the US has tent cities within yards of a skyscraper.
Your criticism of the Chinese in this response is that they are an unbalanced mix of too rich and too poor. Kind of sounds like our country, huh?
Your racism doesn't appear to be based in logic here. Is that on oversight on your part or was it a conscious decision?
I'm not underestimating fascists. That's preposterous to allege. 😃
I am saying that the organizational heirarchy that led to Jan. 6 is gone in prison or acting as informants. Steve Bannon isn't sending $20k in bitcoin to Jim or Ron Watkins anymore, everybody else's funding is dried up. The situation has changed.
I don't know if a king starting his own religion to avoid following the rules of a different religion is that progressive.