[-] bucho@lemmy.one 51 points 9 months ago

I love this guy's channel. Two of my other favorite things he's done are: Uppest Case / Lowest Case, and that time he Reverse Emulated a NES.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 67 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What's hilarious about this is that the Tankies are kind of right, that Russia invading Ukraine is at least partially the US' fault. Of course, this is more of a "A broken clock is right twice per day" kind of thing. The US promised Ukraine that it would defend them from Russian aggression in order to get them to sign the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances in 1994, which got them to destroy their nuclear stockpile. Until that point, Ukraine actually had the world's 3rd largest stockpile of nuclear weapons due to their Soviet heritage. Then, Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, and the US did nothing. So Russia felt confident in invading once again in February of 2022. If the US had stuck to their word in the Budapest Memorandum, Russia would not have attempted to invade them again. But, alas, the US was too concerned with Russia's nuclear stockpile to do anything other than send Ukraine MREs back in 2014. So, here we are.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 42 points 9 months ago

Translation: Bjørn Gulden is putting out feelers to see if Kanye is still universally hated for his antisemitic comments so he can decide whether it would be a good business decision to reinstate the Yeezy line.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 48 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

To be fair, Anton Chigurh also flipped a coin to decide people's fate, and that dude was fucking terrifying. And he didn't even use a gun. Most of the time, anyway.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 89 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure how anybody could have respect for someone, like Ellis, who was so completely illiterate to not be able to read the incredibly obvious writing on the wall. Trump didn't morph into a malignant narcissist. That's always been who he was. Hell - it's been his brand for as long as he's been in the public eye. To think that a malignant narcissist would choose to be grateful to you or treat you like a person and not a means to an end is the very height of hubris. Stupid, blind hubris.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 63 points 9 months ago

Well this is definitely the stupidest bullshit I've read all day. It's exactly akin to people who say that Nostradamus predicted 9/11 or whatever. It's vague nonsense that can be mapped onto whatever current event you want.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 42 points 10 months ago

Gender is a lie made up by Big Bathroom to sell more bathrooms.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 40 points 10 months ago
[-] bucho@lemmy.one 47 points 11 months ago

Hah! Bet that'll go over a treat with that crowd.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Damn. Dude creates an account, and doesn't post or comment with it for 2 months. Then, he breaks that streak by posting possibly one of the dumbest things I've ever seen. What a fuckin' legend.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 100 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm guessing he's wearing the Steven Crowder shirt, actually. It's got that same picture of Che on it, with the same font. If that's the case, the shirt's full message says "Socialism is for f*gs". The "is for f*gs" part is underneath Che's face, and so is obscured in this image.

I would normally link to that shirt, but fuck Steven Crowder. Not gonna be responsible for driving traffic to that shithead's website.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 71 points 11 months ago

Terminal velocity isn't the fastest that an object can travel. It's just the speed at which air resistance and gravity reach an equilibrium. So it's 100% possible to accelerate something past its terminal velocity. Whether you're capable of hurtling a pissed off ball of teeth and claws past that threshold is more a question of your abilities than it is of physics.

1
submitted 1 year ago by bucho@lemmy.one to c/math@lemmy.ml

So I'm gearing up to take a calculus 1 exam, and this question is on the sample test. My initial thought was that since we are looking for F(9), and F(x) is an antiderivative of f(x), I can just use the integral of the equation of f(x) at 9, which is f(x) = -2x/3 + 5, which, when integrated, becomes -x^2/3 + 5x + 2 (C = 2 because F(0) = 2). Thing is, though, that won't give me any of the answers listed. And even after taking the integral of all of the equations of f(x), I still have no idea how to produce any of the answers in the multiple choice.

I'm super stumped on this one. Any help would be welcome!

view more: next ›

bucho

joined 1 year ago