257
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Ellis, one of 18 Trump associates charged in Georgia election subversion case, says she ‘simply can’t support him’ again

Jenna Ellis – the Donald Trump lawyer who like the former president faces criminal charges regarding attempted election subversion in his defeat by Joe Biden in 2020 – says she will not vote for him in the future because he is a “malignant narcissist” who cannot admit mistakes.

“I simply can’t support him for elected office again,” Ellis said. “Why I have chosen to distance is because of that frankly malignant narcissistic tendency to simply say that he’s never done anything wrong.”

Ellis, 38, was speaking on her show on American Family Radio, a rightwing evangelical network run by the American Family Association, a non-profit that by its own description has been “on the frontlines of America’s culture war” since 1977.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bucho@lemmy.one 89 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure how anybody could have respect for someone, like Ellis, who was so completely illiterate to not be able to read the incredibly obvious writing on the wall. Trump didn't morph into a malignant narcissist. That's always been who he was. Hell - it's been his brand for as long as he's been in the public eye. To think that a malignant narcissist would choose to be grateful to you or treat you like a person and not a means to an end is the very height of hubris. Stupid, blind hubris.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

I mean, the whole reason that malignant narcissists are successful is that they're very good at playing on their victims' emotions and deceiving. Even someone as trash as Trump, you see this steady stream of new victims both being willing to sacrifice their own social and professional lives on the altar of his ego and being shocked that he won't comply with contract terms or reciprocate with even a mild inconvenience. Imagine some dude standing next to a hot stove, saying it's not that hot and offering $100 to put a hand on it. Then when someone burns their hand, denying he ever made the offer.

Humans are terrible at rational decisions.

[-] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, the last guy probably cooled the stove down enough when he grabbed it so it should be fine for me.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Like Chris Christie, she supported him for 4 years and then only at the end was suddenly shocked to discover he was a bad guy. Of course he claims he soured on Trump after the Jan 6 insurrection and she broke with hm publicly only after she gets charged alongside him and faces mandatory minimum prison time.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

I think she's virtue signaling for the court. Hoping to sway sentencing when it comes (or praying they let her off now that she sees Trump's a turd).

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

Could be that she's announcing that unless DJT starts paying for her lawyer she's going state's evidence.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Well I don't see DT doing that considering he can't pay for his own at this point.

I hope you're right about the states evidence.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

She might not understand that he's cash-strapped.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

I get the feeling that had they succeeded in overthrowing democracy as planned, she wouldn't be saying this right now. Take that for what you will.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Perhaps the only good thing I can ever say about Trump is how consistent he’s been this whole time. Consistently shitty, but consistent nonetheless. Granted, he makes decisions based on whatever the last person in the room convinced him to do and contradicts himself on a minute-by-minute basis, so he’s even shitty at consistency, but that’s just part of the consistent shittiness. It’s like a human centipede ouroboros.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

She's not illiterate. She was blinded by her own greed.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 15 points 9 months ago

I was being metaphorical with the "illiterate" comment. As in, she's not able to read the writing on the wall.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I know you were. Just like I was being metaphorical with the "blinded" comment.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
257 points (96.7% liked)

politics

18080 readers
3899 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS