[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 56 points 2 hours ago

Apparently "when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal" is now law.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago

Well the obvious solution is spruce.

Personally I've got a chain link fence, so I've planted ivy. In your case, any thick woody plant would probably do. Which one exactly depends on your location and climate.

The real solution would be to fix the ground level, but that's a lot of labor if you're doing it yourself by hand.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago

filed in federal court in New York

Pretty sure you can't sue other countries like that.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 16 hours ago

Apparently he changed it in 2021. And that's his whole name now, no middle or last name.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 17 hours ago

*who

Use "who" with "he", and "whom" with "him".

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

And they continue to lie about everything except that one thing.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 18 points 18 hours ago

Or like when Republicans in the US decided to start outing kids because they confided in a teacher. The right wing in the EU would be able to say "being gay or trans is a mental illness, for their own safety we are going to read their texts and put them in a mental hospital if they mention it to anyone".

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 19 hours ago

Looks like lilies to me. My plant ID app says they're tiger lilies according to its magic. No idea how it can tell.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago

To run a service outside the user context, probably.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago

Most likely, yes. Depression is also correlated with lower immune function, so I'd guess that's one of the ways it tries to compensate.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 45 points 20 hours ago

They've been doing it since their inception. That's the whole point of their existence. Nobody has stopped them yet, why should it be any different now?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

"When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal."

Of course that's only for Republican presidents. The Supreme Court has already shown that they don't care about precedent, so if Biden does something, it'll come back up and they'll find it was not an official act and can be prosecuted, no matter what it was.

314
submitted 2 months ago by catloaf@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

catloaf

joined 4 months ago