chumbalumber

joined 1 year ago
[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

I read that as courting. Which honestly... Yeah?

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Seems to be the general consensus. Thanks all for the help!

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Yeah, being stopped by the police is unlikely, but when the norm and the law is for people to cycle on the road rather than the pavement it leads pedestrians to wander round without watching for cyclists, which in turn means you have to cycle slowly to be prepared for someone to step out in front of you.

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 months ago (13 children)

It's illegal to cycle on the pavement in many countries, and it's a danger to pedestrians.

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where? I never saw them there, but equally didn't go far from the centre

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly, yea. Envy seeing friends having fun going charity shopping when you have leg dimensions 28W/38L is a horror story all its own. At least cute tops are doable

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

UK: never seen a taco bell or dunking donuts

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

They are in many ways more powerful than violence. See the failure of the Kapp Putsch to see them in direct opposition.

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

See also the glorious revolution

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Northampton resident detected. Your opinion is invalid.

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Could also be I am the Doctor

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

Reminds me of the album covers by a band called Flook :)

view more: ‹ prev next ›