uptime could be a problem
or you could read their own citations.
simply reading the LCA studies cited by poore and nemecek will show they are misusing the data.
if there is more than a lick of difference, and you can admit that, then there is no further discussion.
a study like this, posted to Lemmy is just
circle jerking
poore-nemecek is conducting scientific malpractice by combining LCA studies as they have. the problem with behrens, admittedly, is more of a feeling of misgiving, and I don't know if there is any study that properly accounts for reclaimed agricultural water, or of that's even a reasonable thing to do when your end product is a simple statistic like land use, water use, or ghge.
I think the best thing to do is probably look at inefficiencies in any specific operation and help them improve, but that doesn't give simplistic answers like telling 8 billion people to eat more or less of something.
it's a 1% drop in total meat production. beef is just a portion of that. The whole reason for the blip though, was beef production.
you got rookie numbers. i could have had tens of thousands.
view more: next ›
different things are different. that doesn't mean better or less.