cyrano

joined 1 year ago
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
 

Looking up those patents, the first alludes to a system where a player aims and fires an “item” toward a character in a field, and in doing so triggers combat, and then dives into extraordinary intricacies about switching between modes within this. The second is very similar, but seems more directly focused on tweaking previous patents to including being able to capture Pokémon in the wild, rather than only during battle. The third, rather wildly, seems to be trying to claim a modification to the invention of riding creatures in an open world and being able to transition between them easily.

2
Google flood hub (sites.research.google)
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/31680768

Flood Hub’s AI uses diverse, publicly-available data sources, such as weather forecasts and satellite imagery. The technology then combines two models: the Hydrologic Model, which forecasts the amount of water flowing in a river, and the Inundation Model, which predicts what areas are going to be affected and how deep the water will be.

 

Flood Hub’s AI uses diverse, publicly-available data sources, such as weather forecasts and satellite imagery. The technology then combines two models: the Hydrologic Model, which forecasts the amount of water flowing in a river, and the Inundation Model, which predicts what areas are going to be affected and how deep the water will be.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Here are some of the most well-known Ferengi Rules of Acquisition:

Rule 1: Once you have their money, never give it back. 

Rule 3: Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to. 

Rule 6: Never allow family to stand in the way of opportunity. 

Rule 7: Keep your ears open. 

Rule 9: Opportunity plus instinct equals profit. 

Rule 16: A deal is a deal... until a better one comes along. 

Rule 17: A contract is a contract is a contract... but only between Ferengi. 

Rule 21: Never place friendship above profit. 

Rule 45: Expand or die. 

Rule 59: A smart Ferengi can hear profit in the wind. 

Rule 62: The riskier the road, the greater the profit. 

Rule 74: Knowledge equals profit. 

Rule 85: A Ferengi without profit is no Ferengi at all. 

Rule 94: Females and finances don't mix.

Rule 98: Every man has his price.

Rule 102: A Ferengi with no latinum is no Ferengi at all. 

Rule 162: Even in the worst of times, someone turns a profit. 

Rule 208: Sometimes the only thing more dangerous than a question is an answer.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

Working for me

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
 

Three weeks ago a user on Reddit’s London discussion forum complained about the curse of the viral restaurant. It’s a regular story in the capital these days: Someone opens a great food stall, it grows slowly by word-of-mouth, then suddenly a single TikToker does a video declaring it to be “THE BEST SANDWICH IN LONDON”. The algorithm does its thing, millions of people around the world immediately want to eat THE BEST SANDWICH IN LONDON, and the original customers are squeezed out by hundreds of people queuing for an hour to get their Instagram shot of two slices of bread and filling.

One pseudonymous London Reddit user, operating under the account name Greenawayer, proposed a solution that was as far away from the authentic neighbourhood food stall as they could imagine: “Angus Steakhouse does an awesome steak sandwich. Influencers should try it and be amazed.”

Londoners on Reddit got the joke – what could be less like a great undiscovered word-of-mouth recommendation that a bland corporate restaurant chain that has been the butt of jokes since the 1980s? And so they began an effort to bump Angus Steakhouse up the rankings of TripAdvisor and artificial intelligence recommendations. Every request from a visitor for the best place to eat in London received the same reply: Angus Steakhouse.

 

"Exposure to short duration gravity load changes including microgravity, as sustained in a parabolic flight statistically significantly decreases the sperm motility and vitality of human fresh sperm samples," the team found, adding that this may have huge importance for any prolonged human settlement missions in space. 

"In the future, should humans remain in space for long periods of time with exposure to different microgravity and hypergravity peaks, which could range from months to a number of years, reproduction may pose a problem to be tackled."

The mechanism by which sperm motility was decreased remains unknown, with further study needed.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (7 children)
view more: next ›