deinu

joined 1 week ago
[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

My bad, thanks for calling out. I went to search the post to back it up and found out I actually confused this drama with the recent feddit.org dramas

 

Source

Translation to English:

Page 1

OFFICIAL STATEMENT

UNIVERSITY HIGHER COUNCIL

IN THE FACE OF THE INCREASE IN PUNITIVE ACTIONS BY THE GOVERNMENT

The Higher University Council of the University of El Salvador, in its capacity as the authority of the country's public higher education institution, and consistent with its historical commitment to the defense of human rights, legality and social justice, expresses its concern about recent events that may affect the rule of law and the exercise of fundamental freedoms of citizens in El Salvador; and about them STATES:

  1. Arrests of social and professional actors

Recently, there have been arrests of several social actors, professionals, and businessmen; punitive actions that generate great concern in Salvadoran society and in the international community, in view of the apparent disrespect for the principle of typicity, due process and constitutional and legal guarantees of the persons captured; who exercised their right and duty of citizenship to dissent from actions that seem unjust to them.

  1. Use of public force in peaceful demonstrations

That the recent and increasingly frequent excessive and disproportionate use of public force against persons who demonstrate peacefully also causes great concern, due to the negative impact it has on the exercise of the legitimate right of citizens to demonstrate against those actions or decisions of the government that they consider harmful to their rights and interests.

Page 2

  1. Approval of the Foreign Agents Act UNIVERSITY OF EL SALVADOR

That the recently approved legislative decree containing the so-called Law on Foreign Agents constitutes a clear restriction ◦ limitation of the citizen's right to international solidarity and to associate freely for the achievement of his or her aims; which will also have a negative impact on the population in general and particularly on the poorest, to whom the so-called NGs have traditionally channeled international cooperation, thus reaching segments of the population that the State Government does not reach. A decree that, moreover, constitutes a forbidden threat against the existence of the organizations themselves, since their registration ◦ validity is at the discretion of government officials; and against the directors of the aforementioned social organizations, since, in their content, there are blank criminal provisions, which may be activated against them at their discretion.

  1. Implications for democracy and human rights

Taken together, these negative developments could have repercussions on: the attention to the basic needs of communities and social sectors, which are not met by the State, ◦ are met with a great deficiency; in the validity of democratic principles and in respect for the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic and in international treaties signed by El Salvador.

Page 3

By virtue of the above, the SUPERIOR UNIVERSITY COUNCIL (CSU), making use of its powers:

Calls on the competent authorities to guarantee respect for due process and fundamental freedoms for all natural and legal persons, regardless of their affiliation or professional activity.

Calls for constructive dialogue between government, civil society and other relevant actors, in order to address existing concerns and strengthen social cohesion.

Calls for the development of a State policy which, far from limiting the organized social fabric and closing the doors to international cooperation channeled in this way, strengthens the work of institutions that truly work for the benefit of the most needy and the ethical and responsible strengthening of the national democratic system and creates conditions so that cooperation can continue to give its support, with the guarantee that their contribution goes directly to the beneficiaries of the service.

Reiterates the commitment of the University of El Salvador to the promotion of a just, equitable society that respects human rights. and makes itself available to contribute to initiatives that promote peace and mutual understanding.

"TOWARDS FREEDOM THROUGH CULTURE"

University City, May 22, 2025.

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

It'd not be sensationalization if it is needed such due highlightning of troubling risks and they are very real threats being openly discussed

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Worth mentioning a free open-source selfhosteable solution to that: iocaine

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least they give a platform for people to speak out and it's public, but yes disappointing although if you see the other cross-posts some are not straight talking about the risks other than just saying it's about mass surveillance or metadata collection which could ring less alarm bells for people reading it (i know mass surveillance should be enough but oh well)

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

A bit of misunderstanding the urgency of the situation to not call it straight mass surveillance in the title to bring more attention to it not to say about the built-in backdoors as well

 

Archived URL (Wayback Machine) - Original URL (in case of Wayback Machine downtime)

A small portion of the article:

At the end of May, Meta will start using Europeans’ data to train its AI. Here is how you can exercise your rights and prevent it.

Instagram and Facebook users in Europe will soon have their data and posts used by parent company Meta to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models.

Europeans have until May 27 to restrict Meta from using their data, the date when the company will start using Europe’s data.

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

Data Protection Commission (DPC) is already on record working any possible corners Meta could cut to protect in such case of AI usage of European data Article in this regard ongoing development: Archived URL (Wayback Machine) - Original URL

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Theoretically it should but in regard to this usage in AI, it seems to be an ongoing development to adapt GDPR for such cases too I guess? From the article mentioned in the post:

Users in Europe can object to their data being scraped and like other countries, opt of Meta using your data. But Meta does not guarantee it will allow this and says it will “review objection requests in accordance with relevant data protection laws”.

Also, a snippet of a report from Data Protection Commission (DPC) regarding this use of AI and specifically about Meta:

Whilst acknowledging that aspects of the application of GDPR to this fast changing technology remains complex, through our regulatory engagement the DPC has ensured that companies understand what is required in order to reduce high risks and harms to individuals. This has resulted in a number of companies implementing improvements and additional data protection safeguards prior to launch in the EU.

In March 2024, Meta informed the DPC of its plans to train its Large Language Model using public content shared by adults on Facebook and Instagram across the EU/EEA. Having engaged with Meta, and having reviewed initial correspondence, the DPC identified a number of issues with the proposed roll-out of Meta’s plans.

The DPC communicated its concerns to Meta, following which Meta informed the DPC in June 2024 of its plans to pause the training of its model. The DPC also engaged with its European Data Protection Board (EDPB) peer supervisory authorities by seeking a formal GDPR Opinion in September 2024. The DPC’s objective in seeking an Opinion was to achieve Europe-wide regulatory harmonisation and clarity on a number of key AI model training and deployment related questions. The Opinion, which was issued in December 2024, provided general criteria that Data Protection supervisory authorities should take into account when assessing compliance of the processing of personal data for the development and the deployment of AI models.

Source: Archived URL (Wayback Machine) - Original URL

 

I know it's not an European service but I thought for those many who just ghost platforms when switching services instead of deleting their accounts when moving to European alternatives should be aware of this news

Archived URL (Wayback Machine) - Original URL (in case of Wayback Machine downtime)

A small portion of the article:

At the end of May, Meta will start using Europeans’ data to train its AI. Here is how you can exercise your rights and prevent it.

Instagram and Facebook users in Europe will soon have their data and posts used by parent company Meta to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models.

Europeans have until May 27 to restrict Meta from using their data, the date when the company will start using Europe’s data.

 

Archived URL (Wayback Machine) - Original URL (in case of Wayback Machine downtime)

A small portion of the article:

At the end of May, Meta will start using Europeans’ data to train its AI. Here is how you can exercise your rights and prevent it.

Instagram and Facebook users in Europe will soon have their data and posts used by parent company Meta to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models.

Europeans have until May 27 to restrict Meta from using their data, the date when the company will start using Europe’s data.

 

Archived URL (Wayback Machine) - Original URL (in case of Wayback Machine downtime)

A small portion of the article:

At the end of May, Meta will start using Europeans’ data to train its AI. Here is how you can exercise your rights and prevent it.

Instagram and Facebook users in Europe will soon have their data and posts used by parent company Meta to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models.

Europeans have until May 27 to restrict Meta from using their data, the date when the company will start using Europe’s data.

 

If the link is borking, you can check it out in the original link - the archived link is with no paywall while Washington Post limits how many you can read for free (archive.org does not archive Washington Post)

For this story, Washington Post reporters interviewed more than 30 current and former federal employees. To confirm those workers’ stories, they reviewed agency badge credentials, layoff notices and internal agency emails. Sources who spoke to The Post anonymously did so to avoid retribution from their agency or the Trump administration.

 

If the link is borking, you can check it out in the original link - the archived link is with no paywall while Washington Post limits how many you can read for free (archive.org does not archive Washington Post)

For this story, Washington Post reporters interviewed more than 30 current and former federal employees. To confirm those workers’ stories, they reviewed agency badge credentials, layoff notices and internal agency emails. Sources who spoke to The Post anonymously did so to avoid retribution from their agency or the Trump administration.

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The archived link tied to the post is of this article on MailOnline and the one in the description is from Washington Post, any news at all you should be skeptical not just "suicide" headlines though

 

Also reported in White House officials wanted to put federal workers ‘in trauma.’ It’s working. - Washington Post (archived link)

All tied to Musk's doing with DOGE and his bought political influence

 

Also reported on MailOnline (Archived link)

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Actually it does fit if you read the entire article, technology isn't just about electronics but the application of scientific knowledge to practical ends which she clearly did and contributed to til that point.

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

"We should sanction non-approved messaging services because they are open to abuse by foreign governments." Sure. What about USA putting backdoors into things and the backdoors being used by said foreign governmemts? What a terrible argument.

Chinese Hackers Used U.S. Government-Mandated Wiretap Systems

[–] deinu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

"We should sanction non-approved messaging services because they are open to abuse by foreign governments." Sure. What about USA putting backdoors into things and the backdoors being used by said foreign governmemts? What a terrible argument.

Chinese Hackers Used U.S. Government-Mandated Wiretap Systems

view more: next ›