dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 3 months ago

LLMs are a development from machine learning of the sort that works, and translation was always squishy. Just a straight LLM can do surprisingly well at translation, though if I run "surprisingly well" through a translator it comes out as "impressive demo, not so great product." Tools like Google Translate are a complex array of stuff, not just one approach.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 3 months ago

lol i can replicate this glitch for glitch

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 3 months ago

that second last para is why Sam's AI metafiction is so fucking terrible

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 3 months ago

we don't shove rationalists into lockers any more since we all read Worm

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 3 months ago

this is notes, not a thesis, i have the links to hand

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is wrong with you?

the blog tagline is "Dysgenics, forecasting, machine learning, sociology, physiognomy, IQ, simulations", so he tells us straight up what's wrong with him

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

wot i got so far:

Current “artificial general intelligence” researchers have a repeated habit of using a definition of “intelligence” from psychologist and ardent race scientist Linda Gottfredson. The definition looks innocuous, but was from Gottfredson’s 1994 Wall Street Journal op-ed, “Mainstream Science on Intelligence,” a farrago of race science put forward as a defense of Charles Murray’s book The Bell Curve — signed off by 52 other race scientists, 20 of whom were from the Pioneer Fund.

Gottfredson’s piece was cited in Shane Legg’s Ph.D dissertation “Machine Super Intelligence,” in which he called it “an especially interesting definition as it was given as part of a group statement signed by 52 experts in the field” and that it therefore represented “a mainstream perspective” — an odd way to refer to Pioneer Fund race scientists. Somehow, this passed Legg’s dissertation committee.

The definition made it from Legg’s Ph.D into Microsoft and OpenAI’s “Sparks of AGI” paper, and from there to everyone else who copies citations to fill out their bibliography. When called out on this, Microsoft did finally remove the citation.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I have a half written text about working definitions of intelligence in the AI field and whoops, it's all racism!

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

not if i can avoid it

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago

enterprise dildomancy

figure 1: the loved one whacks a keyboard with a dildo, thus reproducing Tumblr

"coded by dildo" coined in this post and I have a whole tag here going back nearly 10 years

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 3 months ago (4 children)

previously known as "coding by whacking the keyboard with dildos"

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

i've changed my mind, cursor is now the best ai coding tool

(just writing this up as today's Pivot)

 

WE'RE BACK

 

Note: I don't care if the issues listed can be fixed - it's still like selling a nonworking car then getting the users to go to the shady cyberpunk district to get the fixes. It's like selling a dangerous power adapter and then go, hey, you can get an expert to go in there and do some soldering to the bridge rectifier and bulk cap trace widths, fix up the spark gaps so it complies with the most basic of safety regulations, and it will work as well as the competitor's, so aren't they practically the same? "Duurp, well at least you CAAAN get inside and solder-" Hey, what if a power supply just worked and was well featured? After like 40 years of development. Ever thought about that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›